Java programmers use data structures to store and organize data, and we use algorithms to manipulate the data in those structures. The more you understand about data structures and algorithms, and how they work together, the more efficient your Java programs will be.

This tutorial launches a short series introducing data structures and algorithms. In Part 1, you'll learn what a data structure is and how data structures are classified. You'll also learn what an algorithm is, how algorithms are represented, and how to use time and space complexity functions to compare similar algorithms. Once you've got these basics, you'll be ready to learn about searching and sorting with one-dimensional arrays, in Part 2.

## What is a data structure?

Data structures are based on abstract data types (ADT), which Wikipedia defines as follows:

An ADT doesn't care about the memory representation of its values or how its operations are implemented. It's like a Java interface, which is a data type that's disconnected from any implementation. In contrast, a *data structure* is a concrete implementation of one or more ADTs, similar to how Java classes implement interfaces.

Examples of ADTs include Employee, Vehicle, Array, and List. Consider the List ADT (also known as the Sequence ADT), which describes an ordered collection of elements that share a common type. Each element in this collection has its own position and duplicate elements are allowed. Basic operations supported by the List ADT include:

- Creating a new and empty list
- Appending a value to the end of the list
- Inserting a value within the list
- Deleting a value from the list
- Iterating over the list
- Destroying the list

Data structures that can implement the List ADT include fixed-size and dynamically sized one-dimensional arrays and singly-linked lists. (You'll be introduced to arrays in Part 2, and linked lists in Part 3.)

## Classifying data structures

There are many kinds of data structures, ranging from single variables to arrays or linked lists of objects containing multiple fields. All data structures can be classified as primitives or aggregates, and some are classified as containers.

## Primitives vs aggregates

The simplest kind of data structure stores single data items; for example, a variable that stores a Boolean value or a variable that stores an integer. I refer to such data structures as *primitives*.

Many data structures are capable of storing multiple data items. For example, an array can store multiple data items in its various slots, and an object can store multiple data items via its fields. I refer to these data structures as *aggregates*.

All of the data structures we'll look at in this series are aggregates.

## Containers

Anything from which data items are stored and retrieved could be considered a data structure. Examples include the data structures derived from the previously mentioned Employee, Vehicle, Array, and List ADTs.

Many data structures are designed to describe various entities. Instances of an `Employee`

class are data structures that exist to describe various employees, for instance. In contrast, some data structures exist as generic storage vessels for other data structures. For example, an array can store primitive values or object references. I refer to this latter category of data structures as *containers*.

As well as being aggregates, all of the data structures we'll look at in this series are containers.

## Design patterns and data structures

It's become fairly common to use design patterns to introduce university students to data structures. A Brown University paper surveys several design patterns that are useful for designing high-quality data structures. Among other things, the paper demonstrates that the Adapter pattern is useful for designing stacks and queues. The demonstration code is shown in Listing 1.

#### Listing 1. Using the Adapter pattern for stacks and queues (DequeStack.java)

```
public class DequeStack implements Stack
{
Deque D; // holds the elements of the stack
public DequeStack()
{
D = new MyDeque();
}
@Override
public int size()
{
return D.size();
}
@Override
public boolean isEmpty()
{
return D.isEmpty();
}
@Override
public void push(Object obj)
{
D.insertLast(obj);
}
@Override
public Object top() throws StackEmptyException
{
try
{
return D.lastElement();
}
catch(DequeEmptyException err)
{
throw new StackEmptyException();
}
}
@Override
public Object pop() throws StackEmptyException
{
try
{
return D.removeLast();
}
catch(DequeEmptyException err)
{
throw new StackEmptyException();
}
}
}
```

Listing 1 excerpts the Brown University paper's `DequeStack`

class, which demonstrates the Adapter pattern. Note that `Stack`

and `Deque`

are interfaces that describe Stack and Deque ADTs. `MyDeque`

is a class that implements `Deque`

.

`DequeStack`

adapts `MyDeque`

so that it can implement `Stack`

. All of `DequeStack`

's method are one-line calls to the `Deque`

interface's methods. However, there is a small wrinkle in which `Deque`

exceptions are converted into `Stack`

exceptions.

## What is an algorithm?

Historically used as a tool for mathematical computation, algorithms are deeply connected with computer science, and with data structures in particular. An *algorithm* is a sequence of instructions that accomplishes a task in a finite period of time. Qualities of an algorithm are as follows:

- Receives zero or more inputs
- Produces at least one output
- Consists of clear and unambiguous instructions
- Terminates after a finite number of steps
- Is basic enough that a person can carry it out using a pencil and paper

Note that while programs may be algorithmic in nature, many programs do not terminate without external intervention.

Many code sequences qualify as algorithms. One example is a code sequence that prints a report. More famously, Euclid's algorithm is used to calculate the mathematical greatest common divisor. A case could even be made that a data structure's basic operations (such as *store value in array slot*) are algorithms. In this series, for the most part, I'll focus on higher-level algorithms used to process data structures, such as the Binary Search and Matrix Multiplication algorithms.

## Flowcharts and pseudocode

How do you represent an algorithm? Writing code before fully understanding its underlying algorithm can lead to bugs, so what's a better alternative? Two options are flowcharts and pseudocode.

## Using flowcharts to represent algorithms

A *flowchart* is a visual representation of an algorithm's control flow. This representation illustrates statements that need to be executed, decisions that need to be made, logic flow (for iteration and other purposes), and terminals that indicate start and end points. Figure 1 reveals the various symbols that flowcharts use to visualize algorithms.

Consider an algorithm that initializes a counter to 0, reads characters until a newline (`\n`

) character is seen, increments the counter for each digit character that's been read, and prints the counter's value after the newline character has been read. The flowchart in Figure 2 illustrates this algorithm's control flow.

A flowchart's simplicity and its ability to present an algorithm's control flow visually (so that it's is easy to follow) are its major advantages. Flowcharts also have several disadvantages, however:

- It's easy to introduce errors or inaccuracies into highly-detailed flowcharts because of the tedium associated with drawing them.
- It takes time to position, label, and connect a flowchart's symbols, even using tools to speed up this process. This delay might slow your understanding of an algorithm.
- Flowcharts belong to the structured programming era and aren't as useful in an object-oriented context. In contrast, the Unified Modeling Language (UML) is more appropriate for creating object-oriented visual representations.

### Using pseudocode to represent algorithms

An alternative to flowcharts is *pseudocode*, which is a textual representation of an algorithm that approximates the final source code. Pseudocode is useful for quickly writing down an algorithm's representation. Because syntax is not a concern, there are no hard-and-fast rules for writing pseudocode.

You should strive for consistency when writing pseudocode. Being consistent will make it much easier to translate the pseudocode into actual source code. For example, consider the following pseudocode representation of the previous counter-oriented flowchart:

```
DECLARE CHARACTER ch = ''
DECLARE INTEGER count = 0
DO
READ ch
IF ch GE '0' AND ch LE '9' THEN
count = count + 1
END IF
UNTIL ch EQ '\n'
PRINT count
END
```

The pseudocode first presents a couple of `DECLARE`

statements that introduce variables `ch`

and `count`

, initialized to default values. It then presents a `DO`

loop that executes `UNTIL`

`ch`

contains `\n`

(the newline character), at which point the loop ends and a `PRINT`

statement outputs `count`

's value.

For each loop iteration, `READ`

causes a character to be read from the keyboard (or perhaps a file--in this case it doesn't matter what constitutes the underlying input source) and assigned to `ch`

. If this character is a digit (one of `0`

through `9`

), `count`

is incremented by `1`

.

## Choosing the right algorithm

The data structures and algorithms you use critically affect two factors in your applications:

- Memory usage (for data structures).
- CPU time (for algorithms that interact with those data structures).

It follows that you should be especially mindful of the algorithms and data structures you use for applications that will process lots of data. These include applications used for big data and the Internet of Things.

## Measuring algorithm efficiency

Some algorithms perform better than others. For example, the Binary Search algorithm is almost always more efficient than the Linear Search algorithmâ€“something you'll see for yourself in Part 2. You want to choose the most efficient algorithm for your application's needs, but that choice might not be as obvious as you would think.

For instance, what does it mean if the Selection Sort algorithm (introduced in Part 2) takes 0.4 seconds to sort 10,000 integers on a given machine? That benchmark is only valid for that particular machine, that particular implementation of the algorithm, and for the size of the input data.

As computer scientist, we use time complexity and space complexity to measure an algorithm's efficiency, distilling these into *complexity functions* to abstract implementation and runtime environment details. Complexity functions reveal the variance in an algorithm's time and space requirements based on the amount of input data:

- A
**time-complexity function**measures an algorithm's*time complexity*--meaning how long an algorithm takes to complete. - A
**space-complexity function**measures an algorithm's*space complexity*--meaning the amount of memory overhead required by the algorithm to perform its task.

Both complexity functions are based on the size of input (*n*), which somehow reflects the amount of input data. Consider the following pseudocode for array printing:

```
DECLARE INTEGER i, x[] = [ 10, 15, -1, 32 ]
FOR i = 0 TO LENGTH(x) - 1
PRINT x[i]
NEXT i
END
```

## Time complexity and time-complexity functions

You can express the time complexity of this algorithm by specifying the time-complexity function `t(`

, where *n*) = a*n*+b`a`

(a constant multiplier) represents the amount of time to complete one loop iteration, and `b`

represents the algorithm's setup time. In this example, the time complexity is linear.