What works where: Outlook vs. Outlook vs. native apps

Office 2016 starts to unify the Exchange experience on the desktop, but native apps do better on mobile clients

What works where: Outlook vs. Outlook vs. native apps
Derek Walter

[Editor's note: An updated version of this Outlook comparison was published on Dec. 22, 2016. The content below was correct as of Feb. 3, 2016, but is now outdated in some areas.]

Microsoft is in the midst of reworking its Outlook clients and server software to truly support its mission to bring its Office communications tools everywhere: the Mail, Calendar, People (contacts), and Notes components in Outlook. (I did not include OneNote because it does not work through Exchange but through the still-unfinished OneDrive for Business.) In the meantime, Microsoft has a hodgepodge of clients whose capabilities vary widely, which can bedevil multiplatform organizations.

It may take years for Microsoft to deliver fully on that universal promise, but Outlook 2016 is off to a good start, at least on the desktop. Outlook 2016 is now available for all major platforms, with two exceptions:

  1. Although available for local and personal Office 365 installation, Outlook 2016 (like the full Office 2016 suite) won't be available for enterprise Office 365 installation until later this month. 
  2. Windows Mobile 10, the Windows 10 version of Windows Phone, is still in beta; thus, so is its Office 2016 software. I did not include it here as a result.

Native clients from Apple, Google, and Samsung also support many Outlook features via their Exchange connections, and for some organizations, a mix of Microsoft and non-Microsoft clients may make sense.

To continue reading this article register now

How to choose a low-code development platform