Will we finally learn the truth about 'Webcamgate'?

Tonight the Lower Merion School District will reveal the results of its internal investigation into how it spied on students via their own laptops. Is this a whitewash in the making?

By tomorrow we should know a lot more about Webcamgate, the scandal surrounding a tony school district outside Philadelphia and how it used school-issued laptops to spy on its students.

Tonight at a school board meeting, the district will present the results of its internal investigation. I'm guessing this is one school board meeting that will get more than the usual amount of attention from the media -- no cub reporters here.

[ Also on InfoWorld: Refresh your memory on Webcamgate with Cringely's posts "When schools spy on their students, bad things happen" and "High school confidential: Spies, lies, and alibis" | Stay up to date on all Robert X. Cringely's observations with InfoWorld's Notes from the Underground newsletter. ]

The Readers Digest recap: Lawyers for Harriton High student Blake Robbins sued the Lower Merion School District last February, claiming it was illegally spying on students, using Lan Rev "peeping Tom" software that allowed IT admins to remotely activate Webcams on laptops issued by the district to roughly 2,400 students. Supposedly, these cams were only turned on when a laptop went missing (a stupid idea in any case); from what we've since learned, that may not be entirely true.

There are now class-action suits, groups of parents organized around both sides of the debate, tearful angry denials by school officials, Fifth Amendment silence by a key IT admin, claims by students of Webcams spontaneously turning on for no reason, and so on. It's a soap opera for the Internet age.

Since the story broke, the district claimed it activated the cameras 42 times, all for legitimate reasons (it says), and admitted it collected some 56,000 candid snapshots.

Let's just do the math, shall we? (Wait, let me get out my calculator.) Assuming both figures are accurate, that means 1,333.33 pix per incident. The software was set up to snap a picture every 15 minutes, though the activation periods varied for each cam. On average, that works out to a continuous series of still images lasting 13.9 days for each incident. Heck, let's just round up to two weeks.

Is there any reason why you'd need to take two weeks' worth of photos to locate a missing laptop, especially when you already have other ways of tracking it? I don't think so.

Related:
1 2 Page 1
Page 1 of 2
How to choose a low-code development platform