No other storage topic is more sensitive for vendors and more important for potential customers than performance measurement. I've had vendors refuse to send me a product for review because of disagreements on which speed benchmarks to use during the evaluation.
[ MarioApicella's column is now a blog! Get the latest storage news from the Storage Adviser blog. ]
Even when there is agreement on the tools used to measure performance, vendors may disagree on how to read those results and they'll dispute their relevance. For example, check out how muddy the waters get in this blog exchange about competing arrays from EMC and NetApp.
I won't take sides in that debate. It's rather obvious that those quarrels don't help buyers who are trying to figure out if either of the two solutions fits their requirements.
In December 2001, the Storage Performance Council announced SPC-1, the first benchmark designed specifically to measure storage performance.
SPC-1 and its logical complement, SPC-2, are designed to measure the performance of storage subsystems regardless of their connection to application servers, and to simulate typical business workloads. It's a gross simplification, but to put them in context, think of SPC-1 as a “random” benchmark and of SPC-2 as a “sequential” benchmark. You can learn more about the two benchmarks and read their specs here.
Why didn't the SPC initiative gather more followers? I'm not sure if things have changed since, but according to 2001 reports, disagreements over the randomness of SPC-1 drove at least one vendor, EMC, to leave the council.
Five years later, EMC is still keeping their distance. The council now has about 30 members, but that number sounds rather unimpressive considering the hundreds of vendors crowding today's storage market.
However, SPC has steadily (if not quickly) increased the number of published benchmarks and recently added an SPC-2 Toolkit, initially available for AIX, Solaris and Windows Server 2003, that you should be able to purchase online shortly. (Jan. 8, according to SPC.) The council is also working to produce additional benchmarks to measure the performance of basic components of a storage system including HBAs, disk drives, and applications such as logical volume managers.
Will these efforts attract more attention and followers to SPC? Perhaps, but as the number of published benchmarks grows, SPC should make those results more easily accessible. Right now, to assess how a storage system such as the Fujitsu Eternus fared in the SPC tests, you have to dig out those numbers from a PDF file. Not the friendliest nor the quickest way to find what you need.
Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.
The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.
Download now »
Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.
Download now »
A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.
Download now »
Recommend This
