January 29, 2007

Internet Explorer required

Last week, I moderated a Web cast using On24's service. It went well enough, but On24 dealt me a surprise coming into the conference: Its conference coordinator informed me that the participants would have to use Internet Explorer on Windows.

I told On24 that I live on a Mac and that I considered an IE/Windows-only policy not only impractical for me, but not a great idea for their business. The On24 coordinator replied, with no attitude about it, that if IE/Windows gave me a problem, I could skip using the Web client at all, dial into the voice conference and give verbal cues to have my slides advanced. Fly Windows or fly blind.

That's a bit dark ages, isn't it? Surely an outfit of On24's stature wouldn't take the low road with its browser-based client.

I want to establish that I'm not ragging on On24 (see the end of this post to understand why I let them off the hook). Rather, I'm using this to illustrate what I consider to be a serious issue: Users of browser-based applications and services cannot allow the reemergence of the proprietary, platform-bound approach to Web apps that caused the failure of prior efforts in that direction.

As you can imagine, On24's insistence on IE/Windows pushed so many of my buttons that I had to choose between going off and letting it go. I chose the latter course with my desire for continued employment being my primary motivator. For me, Windows is an occupational inevitability. Since Apple treats Windows the same way, I feel no sense of guilt about giving in.

Now we arrive at the twist in this plot: It turns out that On24's client interface does support OS X, and Linux, too. On24 should be bragging about that since such flexibility is lacking in most of its competitors' services. Finding no collateral expressing On24's system requirements, I located On24's compatibility test and I'll use that as the last word on the issue. When I ran the test on a Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro using OS X 10.4.8 and Apple's Safari browser, the test fails. I expected that; Safari is rarely a validation target for commercial browser front-ends. However, the OS portion of On24's test reported "Passed," and offered some helpful advice:

200701261638

When I ran the same test using Firefox 2.0 on OS X, I got green lights across the board:

Close

On Twitter now

Platforms

Powered by Twitter

On Twitter now

additional resources
White Paper - How to Improve Delivery of Advanced Web Applications

White Paper

Virtual Workforce: The Key to Expanding The Business While Cutting Costs

Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.

Go inside:
The three-step approach to making a virtual workforce a reality.
The four flavors of client virtualization technologies.
The three key initiatives that solve IT challenges.
Download now »
White Paper: Successfully Secure Your Wireless LAN With Wi-Fi firewalls.

White Paper

Addressing Linux Threats Leveraging Fewer Resources

The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.

Download now »
White Paper - The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

White Paper

The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.

Download now »
White Paper - Is Your Backup System Outdated?

White Paper

Mid-range Storage Considerations

A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.

Download now »

Sign up to receive Platforms Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Today's Headlines: First Look Newsletter

Find out what will be news for the day, with our first-thing-in-the-morning briefing.

©1994-2010 Infoworld, Inc.