The first release of VMware Workstation in 1999 marked the birth of simple system virtualization on the x86 architecture. In the years since, VMware has matured, adding significantly to its product line with GSX Server, a virtualization platform that relies on a host OS.
Virtualization software simplifies computing infrastructure by partitioning and isolating servers into virtual machines, each of which can run its own OS and applications. Virtual machines running under VMWare’s Workstation product can be accessed by any other system via the network, but access to the server console is limited to the workstation running the application.
GSX Server, on the other hand, runs as a daemon process on a host server and thus does not have any console-location constraints. Using a modified, integrated VNC (Virtual Network Computing) server, any virtual system running on the host is accessible to any VMware console client on the network, regardless of guest OS. Moreover, console access is not limited to a single connection, as multiple users can connect to a single virtual system console simultaneously.
The main thrust of the GSX Server line is not necessarily server consolidation. Although running production servers under GSX is certainly possible, the virtual systems are subject to limitations that can reduce their effectiveness in that capacity. For development and quality-assurance purposes however, GSX Server performs admirably.
With the release of GSX Server 3.1, VMware has added support for 64-bit host operating systems. In practice, this means there are 64-bit drivers present, permitting installation on x86_64 platforms. Officially, VMware supports 32-bit guest OSes on 64-bit host servers but not 64-bit guest OSes, so we’ll have to wait a while to run x86_64 code in a VMware guest operating system.
In the lab, I installed VMware GSX Server 3.1 on multiple host systems running Red Hat Advanced Server 3.0, both i386 and x86_64, and 32-bit Windows Server 2003 . The installation under Linux is straightforward, requiring only a single RPM (Red Hat Package Manager) package and functions under v2.4 and v2.6. The Windows installation uses a standard installer.
Next, I installed the MUI (management user interface). The MUI runs a separate SSL-enabled Apache instance on the host server, providing the browser-based server-monitoring application. The application provides at-a-glance virtual server operational status, including CPU and memory resources in use. It also provides links to manage the virtual servers configuration or access the console.
On my workstation, I installed the VMware console application, which is nicely linked from the server management page. Once the console was installed, I could directly access the console of any virtual server, configure virtual server settings, and create new virtual servers. One great feature is the concept of system snapshots, which permits you to take a snapshot of a guest system, modify the system, and quickly revert to the snapshot, reversing any changes. VMware also offers Virtual Center, a Windows-only service that permits consolidated management of multiple VMware host servers and their guest servers.
| Test Center Scorecard | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | |
| 25% | 25% | 15% | 15% | 10% | 10% | ||
| VMware GSX Server 3.1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
8.3
Very Good
|
Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.
The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.
Download now »
Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.
Download now »
A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.
Download now »
Recommend This
