U.S. antitrust enforcers have started to track Microsoft Corp.'s development work on Longhorn, the successor to Windows XP, in a move to ensure that the vendor won't violate the final judgment in the government's antitrust case.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and several U.S. states involved in the case are particularly interested in any changes that Microsoft might make in Longhorn related to default settings and "middleware," or applications associated with the operating system, such as Web browser and media player software, according to a legal filing on Friday.
As part of the final judgment, Microsoft has to make it easy for users and PC vendors to remove access to Microsoft middleware products and select competing products instead. Additionally, Windows can't be programmed to automatically change the configuration of icons, shortcuts or menu entries installed by a PC vendor.
"Early attention to these issues will enable plaintiffs and Microsoft to address any potential concerns in a timely matter, before the final structure of the product is locked into place," the filing reads.
The filing in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a joint status report on Microsoft's adherence to the final judgment in the DOJ's antitrust case against Microsoft, made in 2002. The judgment was entered after Microsoft settled the case with the DOJ and several U.S. states in 2001.
Microsoft has provided the antitrust authorities with information on the development of Longhorn and discussions about the future operating system release have begun, according to the filing. Longhorn is expected to be released in 2006, and a first beta of the product is slated for release in early 2005, Microsoft has said.
A technical committee for the DOJ and the states is also testing the upcoming Service Pack 2 for Windows XP for compliance with the final judgment. The work includes running hundreds of tests to check the behavior of Windows in relation to third-party middleware products. Similar tests will be done with Longhorn, according to the filing.
The joint status report also discusses continuing issues regarding Microsoft's compliance with the final judgment in the antitrust case, including the Microsoft Communications Protocol Program (MCPP) and Microsoft's licensing terms for PC vendors.
The MCPP makes Microsoft's Windows communications protocols available to third parties. Microsoft started licensing its protocols through the program in August 2002, and the program has been revised several times since then in response to comments from the DOJ.
Microsoft is still working on simplifying the technical documentation associated with the MCPP, which it agreed to do in April after complaints were received by the DOJ. Microsoft is also expanding the MCPP program with technical support, according to Friday's filing.
Additionally, the DOJ and the settling states are now satisfied that Microsoft's removal of so-called "nonassert provisions" in the licenses for PC sellers resolves any compliance concerns in that area. The provisions prevented licensees from suing Microsoft over patents related to Windows.
One remaining concern over the MCPP is that Sun Microsystems Inc. still has not signed an agreement it made with Microsoft, the DOJ and the states wrote in Friday's filing. The agreement was announced on April 1 and Microsoft expects it to be signed later this month, according to the filing.
REFERENCES:
MS tells judge about licensing changes, Apr. 21, 2004
Microsoft extends, simplifies protocol licensing, Apr. 14, 2004
Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.
The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.
Download now »
Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.
Download now »
A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.
Download now »
Sign up to receive Platforms Resource Alerts
Recommend This
