In a study of midmarket organizations that have implemented HP ProCurve in a production environment, IDC found that HP ProCurve provides more than sufficient functionality for their current needs and the scalability to grow into the future. more
Doing more with less. Enhanced business agility. Reduced costs. The demands on IT have never been greater, particularly in light of lower revenue and uncertain demand for the goods and services offered by many companies. There are many ways that IT can help organizations adjust to this new economic environment. Learn about five key technology trends that can immediately impact your organization's bottom line, and how to build a strategy to implement these technologies within your current budget. more
My company is currently looking at ITIL as the end all-be all of process development. Let me explain further that I work for a subsidiary of the parent company, not headquarters.
I'm the poor schmuck who is responsible for our problem management system. I brought this thing in nearly a decade ago and have done all the development and support.
I know the very basics of ITIL. I've been spending more time on learning it since I found out just how brainwashed headquarters management is on it. What I've learned confirms that we're in pretty good basic compliance already. We just don't use the ITIL terminology.
On to the problem. Management has decided that our current product does not meet our needs if we're going to go ITIL. They've put together a team to define the business requirements. Guess who isn't on the team?
So now I'm torn. Do I strong-arm my way onto the team so I know what they're looking for or do I sit back and wait for them to provide a list of functions that may or may not be feasible in any product? From what I've found out about the team they've built there's no one on there that actually understands what needs to happen 'under the hood' to make ITIL work.
Any suggestions?
- Outside the tent
Dear Outsider ...
I think you're asking the wrong question, or perhaps you're asking the right question, but prematurely. A better place to begin might be to define more clearly what your personal goal is -- what you'd like to see come out of this.
Let's start by acknowledging that if the folks responsible for the ITIL initiative had the good sense that God gave rice they'd have included you in the effort. After all, you're the person who made the current system happen (I presume it's handling the basics of incident management competently). Unless your departure is part of the ITIL plan it's hard to imagine anything about the effort that's improved through your exclusion.
While that analysis explains whatever bemusement, indignation or resentment you might feel about the situation, it doesn't define your goal. Here are some possibilities:
This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.
An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings
Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.
Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network
The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.
Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation
Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect businesscritical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.