Mozilla's second alpha of Firefox 3.1 is upping the ante in the next-generation browser battle. So how do the main contenders stack up so far now? One thing's for sure, the Firefox team has taken note of Google's recent Chrome release and worked hard to make sure its offering can hold its own.
Mozilla had already claimed its 3.1 version could outperform Chrome when it comes to speed (and most independent tests show it at least tying). Now, the engineers have incorporated Chrome-initiated options such as the ability to drag and drop tabs in and out of browser windows. The second alpha release also adds support for the HTML 5 video tag, which gives Web developers expanded options for embedding video within a page. Don't forget, too, that Microsoft's new Internet Explorer 8 beta 2 -- released at the end of August and quickly eclipsed by Chrome's introduction -- is also vying for a piece of the pie.
[ See the related special report on Google's open source Chrome browser and related story "Firefox fights back." ]
Here's a breakdown of the high and lowlights of each offering and where it stands as far as a full release.
Contender #1: Google Chrome
The status: Windows beta released September 2. Mac OS X and Linux versions still under development and said to be coming soon. No indication of targeted full release date.
The good:
-- Reliability. Chrome's multiprocess architecture makes a bad Web page less likely to take down the whole browser.
-- Speed. Chrome loads fast and keeps your surfing superfast.
-- Simplicity. Its clean design wastes no screen space.
-- Searching. The Omnibox lets you type search terms or URLs into a single spot and figures out what you want.
-- Privacy. Chrome offers an "Incognito" mode that lets you easily leave no footprints from where you've been.
The bad:
-- Privacy. Chrome's taken a lot of heat for its monitoring and collection of user data, some of which happens before you even hit Enter.
-- Security. It didn't take long for users to discover vulnerabilities in the beta browser. Several of these have already been patched.
-- Reliability. Some sites and online services still don't work with Chrome.
-- Consistency. Because Chrome is build on the WebKit system, it differs from the dominant platforms that most designers focus on.
-- Support. Chrome doesn't yet have any add-ons or customization options available. It's yet to be seen how these, once developed, will compare to the rich options available for Firefox.
This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.
Download now »
Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.
Download now »
The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.
Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation
Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.
Download now »
Sign up to receive Applications Resource Alerts
Recommend This
