February 09, 2010

Is Windows 7 the iPad's 'killer app'?

Apple fans show signs of cognitive dissonance with their latest iPad-in-the-enterprise push: The iPad is a terrible enterprise computing device

The iPad is a terrible enterprise computing device. It has limited connectivity options and no multitasking capability, and it's generally a bad corporate citizen. When I hear other pundits talk about the recently announced Citrix Receiver software for iPad as some kind of silver bullet for currying the device's acceptance within the datacenter -- ostensibly by turning it into a Windows-addled zombie -- I shake my head in disbelief. The iPad? Reduced to the role of a thin client for accessing Windows VMs and terminal sessions? Are you serious?

Never mind the absolute crap storm such a blatant misappropriation would generate at 1 Infinite Loop ("Hey Steve-o, guess what people are doing with your shiny new iToy?") -- such logic completely ignores the all-important fact that the iPad makes a pathetic thin client.

[ Does the iPad support Exchange and other business technologies that the iPhone does? Apple won't say -- see what other iPad questions Apple won't answer. ]

For starters, there's the lack of a keyboard and mouse. Because we can assume that most of these Citrix Receiver sessions will be connecting to some kind of Windows instance on the back end (the popular example seems to be Windows 7 -- go figure), the absence of a proper input mechanism will severely hamper productivity. Even if you could somehow kludge Windows' pen and/or touch capabilities to work across the thin client divide, chances are good that the resulting user experience will be clunky at best.

Windows Pulse

Then there's the issue of device integration. Both Citrix and Microsoft have made great strides toward improving the remote Windows terminal experience. You can now connect a variety of devices to a terminal services session using the Remote Desktop Protocol's USB redirection support. And when you step up to the more advanced Citrix client, you gain support for rich media applications, including those that incorporate 3-D rendering.

You can even connect a camera through the latest version of Citrix Receiver, which is ironic since -- of all the devices you might choose as a thin client -- the Apple iPad is one of the few that lacks a Webcam. The same goes for the USB ports that, if available, would have made for a much more flexible thin-client end point (assuming Apple didn't lock them down -- it's shown a penchant for restricting such access points of late).

additional resources
White Paper - How to Improve Delivery of Advanced Web Applications

White Paper

Virtual Workforce: The Key to Expanding The Business While Cutting Costs

Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.

Go inside:
The three-step approach to making a virtual workforce a reality.
The four flavors of client virtualization technologies.
The three key initiatives that solve IT challenges.
Download now »
White Paper: Successfully Secure Your Wireless LAN With Wi-Fi firewalls.

White Paper

Addressing Linux Threats Leveraging Fewer Resources

The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.

Download now »
White Paper - The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

White Paper

The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.

Download now »
White Paper - Is Your Backup System Outdated?

White Paper

Mid-range Storage Considerations

A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.

Download now »
jragosta 9-Feb-10 8:27am
What a clueless article! Let's start at the top and identify the errors: "The iPad is a terrible enterprise computing device." It's not meant as an enterprise computing device. It's meant as a media access device - books, Internet, music, presentations, etc. No one ever claimed it would replace other computing devices - in fact, Apple specifically said it was NOT a laptop or even netbook replacement. You seem to be incapable of evaluating the product for what it IS rather than what you want it to be. "It has limited connectivity options" Let's see. 3G and WiFi standard and via those, you can access virtually anything. I will, however, admit that they left out the string and tin can. Is that what you're looking for? "no multitasking capability" Do you think that by repeating this lie often enough it will magically come true? The iPad multitasks things that make sense. You can play music while reading a book. You can read a book while downloading your email. You can receive an IM chat notification while browsing the web. There's also very fast task switching so you can move back and forth between other things. Admittedly, you can't play Doom and browse the web at the same time, but why would you want to? I've been asking for weeks for an example of what multitasking it needs to do that it won't already accomplish- and no one has been able to give an answer. "it's generally a bad corporate citizen." In what way? This is the type of silly, unsupported comment that bloggers like you like to make. It will work fine in a corporate environment, just like the iPhone already does. Then you start with your whining about Citrix. You apparently don't realize that you can use an external keyboard on the iPad even if you don't like the built-in one. There's also the issue that most people don't need to do heavy computing while on the road. This is not made for an architect to design an entire building from his hotel room - people who have massive computing needs would use a full laptop. It's designed for the executive who needs access to his data files without having to carry his entire computer around with him (which is inconvenient but is also a major security risk). Let me explain how a rational person would see this: "I need to travel and would like to have access to the 4 TB of data on my desktop computer as well as be able to run some simulations for customers, but I don't want to carry all of that with me because I'm concerned about security, so I'll simply install Citrix (or Go To My PC) on my computer and use the iPad to access it". Of course, there's also the large contingent who simply needs email, presentations, and PDFs when traveling and this will suit them fine. I love the way you pan a device simply because it won't meet your Windows-centric expectations. Sure, it won't use Windows Remote Protocol for mounting USB devices, but you don't need to. That's only one way to skin the cat. Not to mention that the overwhelming majority of travelers don't need to skin that cat at all. It really amazes me how people like you insist on attacking a product simply because it doesn't meet YOUR narrow, bigoted view of how it should work. Why not try looking at what it DOES and there are millions of uses.
bccb 9-Feb-10 8:54am
Who cares ... just give me my iPad! Well, I am not a typical business user so I mainly care about some wifi (which it has) and maybe the Skype app (although the 3G is an option too). I don't much care about using it as a total replacement for my laptop just as a lightweight alternative with up to the 10 hour battery life. Keyboard? Well I am open minded so I will try the touchscreen. Look, I mostly just email, browse, and do some 'lite' spreadsheet work on the road. If I can ditch my laptop most of the time this makes sense. I do see your point about input ... but maybe somebody will have a workaround to get files to this iWork(?) app. I don't think playing nice with the Windows world is needed in my case but people will find a way I suppose.The real question is just which one to buy ... 32 GB or 64 GB? Could someone please answer this question. Plus it seems to be a really nice quality device for that price. It looks like a definite buy.
bccb 9-Feb-10 9:04am
1 reply
Thanks jragosta -- I was wondering about notifications -- that was very helpful. If it notifies for chatting or email then I really don't care about multitasking. In fact that was the most helpful comment I have seen ... I was still going to try it but that pushes me over the fence. Also, would you know if it notifies you of a Skype contact? Doesn't really matter now but that would be sweet.
ecrah 9-Feb-10 9:11am
1 reply
Yes background 'Push Notifications' have been on the iPhone almost a year now, it's Apple way of implementing a background process without sacrificing battery life. Apple's 'Push Notifications' is open for any iPhone app developer to use so I'm sure Skype is in development of an updated Skype app to use this feature.
bccb 9-Feb-10 9:57am
1 reply
Thank you ecrah ... this is becoming easier all the time.
WaltFrench 9-Feb-10 2:08pm
1 reply
Yes, IW should thank its commenters for fleshing out real-world use cases versus fuming about Pet Feature X that may not be relevant to even a tiny fraction of end users.

Your usage pattern sounds suspiciously like ALL of my firm's marketing force, except that they'll be showing Powerpoint decks, too. Or like a realtor's on-the-road experience where she'll need to make quick notes, develop flyers/webpages on properties, maybe organize photos, check Zillow and the local Association site; or maybe field techs who need to log work, check schedules, reference PDF manuals, …

As an investment manager, I have 4 screens going at my desktop right now. Even though one is dedicated to a Citrix-like situation because it makes sense to have a thin client, it'd be foolish to think of jamming this into an iPad for my frequent travels. But your situation and the needs of millions of other professionals* makes the iPad look like one sweet device.

* Is “Enterprise” actually a code word for “controlled by Corporate IT?” That sure seems like the mindset here. If so, then the article makes all the sense in the world. Who needs overlords if, once you're set up on email and the VPN, you can install and easily maintain your own presentation software for $10 and a few minutes, versus having IT spend ten times that much on license management people, another ten times that for MS Office, and yet that much more again on configuration management that locks my email home page to point at non-existent messages?
bccb 9-Feb-10 4:37pm
I just want to try that touchscreen format with that iWork(?) software for presentations and simple spreadsheets. It seems to be the lowest common denominator for a lot of things I do. It would be a shocker if this does do away with my travel laptop. Even it doesn't do it all it seems likely it may do at least the basics. I know the screen is small compared to a laptop but that may not be too much of a problem. I don't have an iPhone so I don't know a lot about apps ... brave new world.
ecrah 9-Feb-10 9:05am
I can't help but call this article for what it is, a retarded article. Calling the iPad a, "terrible enterprise computing device" is about as retarded as calling the Nintendo Wii or the DS a terrible enterprise computing device. Why is an 'Enterprise Desktop' writer writing about a consumer orientated device? I could understand if the writer chose to only talking about the iPad Citrix app and how that would or would not fail in the enterprise, and it would have been fine. But no, almost the entire article is about the iPad in the enterprise. I often read and comment on articles about Apple products because I love them, what I don't do is read or comment on products that I find not to my liking or have not desire to purchase. So why is it that Windows Fanboys - like the writer here - seem to keep screaming and shouting about a product that they revile or have not intreats in buying. Especially Windows Fanboy commenters who go out their way to find Apple articles just to flame them. I'm off to write an piece now titled, "Windows, a terrible refrigerating device". I wonder if Infoworld would be interested in publishing it. [ by the way I found this article from a link in Macsurfer ]
Buckminster 9-Feb-10 9:42am
If the iPad is such a "terrible" device for the kind of work we do because it lacks a keyboard and mouse, why would any of the "myriad" Windows 7 tablets "coming down the pike" be worth waiting for? They will also be terrible enterprise computing devices, by definition. Especially since Windows 7 is far more reliant upon a keyboard and mouse than the iPhone OS.
SteveL 9-Feb-10 10:31am
1 reply
I think Randall is right on track with this article. Infoworld's focus is on corporate computing, and the iPad is a terrible platform for corporate use. None of the others posting comments have stated anything the iPad can do which provide benefits to a business over what the iPhone can already do. Some suggested that you could use it to read electronic books - what's the big deal about that? The iPad could have been a semi-useful device if Apple had included a USB port or memory card slot. I have no desire to buy an over-sized iPod that has no camera, no phone capability, and no ports to plug in other devices (keyboard, memory stick, etc). Compare the iPad to a netbook which has those other capabilities at the same price, and the iPad comes up way short.
bccb 9-Feb-10 10:54am
1 reply
Yes, maybe you're correct but I just want to try it. Was Infoworld called 'Corporate Infoworld' before? I can't remember ... I just want some info. Can anyone give me a very rough estimate for how much room is left after maybe 10 gigs of music and pictures plus subtracting out the OS? I just need to make an estimate if 32 GB or 64 GB will suffice for a bunch of additional apps. What is the average size of an app ... even if I were to double or triple that size then I could see if I would be able to fit a few working files with those iWork(?) apps. Any guesstimates??
Synthmeister 9-Feb-10 11:04am
1 reply
Most apps are well under a GB. For example, some of the larger, graphics intensive games run around 100 to 200 MB. But that's actually pretty big for an app. Most are under 50 MB.
bccb 9-Feb-10 12:06pm
Thank you Synthmeister ... finally some real 'info'. I didn't mean to sound so frustrated but I expect these type of technology sites to provide some real input to help us make decisions. So in your opinion is 32 GB or 64 GB the way to go? One other question, if I may ask, is the 3G version worth going for?? As it stands right now I am not in a metro area but I may be traveling to them.
Louis wheeler 9-Feb-10 10:47am
Thank you, Jragosta, for saying things which I intended to remark on. All these articles about Apple and the Enterprise market are misapplied. Besides being obsessive navel gazing, they are obtuse. They are not real world. The Computer World no longer revolves around IT and its interests. It is bizarre to assume that each new Apple product is part of an Enterprise push. The Enterprise market is huge, but it is a stagnating, replacement market. There is nothing exciting to it. Apple is creating NEW markets. The iPad is a reflection of that. Also, the money is found in new markets. It is from extending computers to people who never had their needs met before. I see no evidence that Apple is interested in the Enterprise market as a whole. Partly, this is because the term "Enterprise Market" is contrived to describe a Microsoft enclave. Apple would be foolish to attack Wintel in this area, although it will nibble away at the edges. If you broke up the Enterprise market into its component parts (government, big business and big server sales, Small to Medium sized Businesses and its servers) then you might say something interesting about Apple and each. Apple has no problem selling into the government and Big Business markets, but it has little interest too. It certainly has no interest in changing its consumer oriented marketing program to focus on them. Apple, since 1998, has been moving out of the market niches, of graphics, design and education, which it had been backed into. Since then, Apple has cautiously moved in to take over the upper, more fashionable and profitable, end of the consumer market. Recently, Apple has been making moves into the Small to Medium sized Business markets and the servers they would use. Many of Apple's overtures to the SMB market have been misinterpreted as a move toward Enterprise. Apple has no interest in the low end of the consumer market. The iPad is not designed to compete there, although many people will find that the iPad will replace their need for a NetBook or a low end PC. So, what current computer market segment is the iPad designed for? None. The IPad is intended to serve the computing needs of the billions of people who do not use computers now because they are afraid of them. That is why the iPad is so unlike previous computers that IT personnel consider it a toy. Those previous computers have scared off millions of people by being too difficult to use. The iPad is not designed for businesses, although many business people will find that it can serve their needs. The FOSS community, like they did with the iPhone, will create software to extend the iPad into areas which Apple has no interest. The iPad will find itself in Enterprise areas because the Wintel market is doing such a poor job of competing. The iPad will be found in board rooms, sales offices or anywhere people need to make small or one-on-one presentations. More importantly, the iPad will be in the back packs of First Graders.
Synthmeister 9-Feb-10 11:01am
"Apple fans show signs of cognitive dissonance with their latest iPad-in-the-enterprise push..." Hmm, I don't remember anyone talking about the iPad being "perfect" for enterprise during Steve Jobs iPad presentation. Were we watching the same presentation? But never-mind, the iPhone has been integrated into 1000s of businesses without problem and is used by hundreds of thousands of business people every day, enterprise or not. The iPad will be no different and no more difficult to integrate than the iPhone even though it won't have " the full richness and fidelity of a local Windows user experience." Sure, in many cases, having a real computer--Mac or PC-- will be a better option, but there will be many new cases where the iPad --just like the iPhone--will be a much better option. Especially once all the developers let loose custom apps in the next two months. A real IT pro would see the unique possibilities the iPad offers especially in those situations where people would be better off without having to futz with mice or system folders or keyboards or hours of training to get people up to speed on klutzy software. And BTW, the iPad works with any BT keyboard.
agedwirehead 9-Feb-10 11:05am
Well, Kennedy, you finally got me to figure out how I can use an iPad. Clearly, you are missing the point at least as much as I was. Back in '77 I thought PCs were just like an IBM 360 circa 1968 shrunk down to manageable size. (I worked on both; there is a similarity). Although I wasn't completely wrong, I missed the point. Just because a device's primary functions are provided by a computer chip does not mean the device is a "business computer". A car is not a computer. A toaster is not a computer. However, both devices can provide the user better services when thy have a well-designed computer inside. When I got over worrying about what a Mac Book Air could not do, I was surprised to find how wonderful it is to use mine. It cannot fully replace the Mac Book Pro, iMac, or a PC, but it is my carry-it-around-throw-it-down device of choice. If I can get over my love of the feel of printed paper in my hands, I might read a novel on an iPad. However, if it provides quality, unfettered access to Safari Books Online without worrying about my client's wifi or fifty other open windows on my laptop, I'm all in.
junkie4sale 9-Feb-10 11:09am
1 reply
This is a silly article. The author never justifies his claim that Win7 is necessary for an enterprise device. Indeed, Windows 7 is not that important for this device. Of course you can have a useful enterprise device without Windows 7. The Blackberry is considered a good enterprise device yet it does not have Windows at all. It qualifies as an enterprise device because carved out a set of benefits that were unique to it and it followed norms for expected security in an enterprise. There are a couple ways an enterprise could use an iPad effectively. First, as a client for web apps. There is nothing that the iPad is missing to provide this function. I don't think enterprises are using Flash in their operations. The iPad as a web device should be a perfectly fine enterprise device for web-based enterprise applications. There is no need for Windows 7 to roll out a web based app. Second, an enterprise that really adopts the iPad might use a compiled iPad app, either in-house or off the shelf, in its business processes. Well, here again, there is no need for Windows 7. The enterprise worthiness of the iPad in this case will depend more on the app than anything having to do with the iPad. I don't agree with those above who say the iPad is not meant for business. iPad seems really compelling as a saies-force tool to make demonstrations, data collection and transaction completion. You have a compact wireless pad that is easy to build apps for, that has built-in wireless, all day battery and people would be excited to carry. I don't see why multi-tasking is an issue here. The iPad has multi-tasking where it counts, checking email in the background for example. Do enterprise workers need to have Pandora playing while they fill out forms? No. You don't need USB on this device. It has an online keyboard and pointing with touch. There is no need to plug in other devices and if you did need to connect another device to the iPad you can use the dock port or bluetooth. USB is not that critical. A webcam, while nice in some cases, would be nice but is not critical for enterprise workers - some enterprises don't want cams on devices. And Tablet have been available with Windows for a long time. Maybe a better article would be talking about why they failed? Maybe they added cost to the laptop, offered little benefit and did not work that well? I can see those swivel hinges failing fast. How many times do you want to deal with that.
notclueless 9-Feb-10 3:51pm
Junkie, you're right. In fact, my most useful computing experience is NOT using Windows 7... or any other kind of Windows. And yet people compare this to a tablet. It clearly isn't intended to compete with anything on the market today.
DaveN 9-Feb-10 3:16pm
1 reply
Jeeze, you got the iSheep all riled up : -) Am I incorrect in thinking that 99% of the iPad "information" provided by the commenters is speculation? I wasn't aware that Apple had announced new information - for example, have they "corrected" the original statement that multitasking isn't supported? In defense of the Citrix crowd, I think they're just straining to find a use for the iPad that would make sense to a business user. I mean, it doesn't run your messaging client, Office, your accounting app, etc. I'm not saying it needs to, and it'll probably be great for home users; I'm just not seeing the business justification.
ecrah 9-Feb-10 3:26pm
Which of the 99% are you talking about that we "iSheep" are "speculating" on. Yes the iPad isn't being sold yet BUT it has been launched and the information about the product has been officially be released by Apple. Secondly a smaller version of the iPad is and has been selling for over 2 years now. Therefor it cannot be claimed as "speculation". More Wintard FUD from another Wintard.
starranger00 9-Feb-10 3:36pm
What a bunch of nothing when it is all said and done. The iPad may be useful for some, not for others. It would no doubt have been more useful with a USB port and a Webcam. How many people would use an iPad for video conferencing if only a webcam were included? Apple could have made a much bigger spash had they included those two items. Obviously they felt that it wouldn't make a difference to sales. This means they were not aiming for corporate market penetration. So what? Apple could have done much better in a tablet device had they truly wanted to make inroads into corporate America. By the way, I am a Systems Administrator in a Windows shop but I use and love my iPhone. Not a contradiction at all. Different devices for different purposes. Just like the iPad and Netbooks.
RamboTribble 9-Feb-10 3:39pm
Characteristically, Apple has left it to the enterprise to adapt to their products and done little on their part to facilitate that adaption. The iPad is just the latest iteration of this hubris.
nwjh 9-Feb-10 3:43pm
Ladies and gentlemen,
The ideas, the discussion and the information flowing in the comments are marvelous, as well as civil and civilized. Such a contrast to Randall's mindless and vitriolic parroting of meaningless catch-phases and slogan. Well done! This is really what InfoWorld should be about.
Because we don't know just how people will apply the iPad to what they do, as well as what new they discover to do with it, it's too early to judge the device. It isn't even released yet, and there are still rumors about cameras, etc. We don't know how the connections will work through the port, but if there is the capacity to run a video projector, who knows what else could be connected. Maybe even a data card reader or USB connection.
Why didn't Randall berate the iPad for lack of a parallel port, RS-232, FireWire, or DVI for a second monitor? They are just as absent, and probably still in use by certain users. And Windows as the 'Gold Standard' by which everything is judged? Come on. Win7 is the first version of Windows that hasn't had hordes of early adopters foaming at the mouth over its limitations and shortcoming.
Randall, you've written some columns that would have to be considered a joke or a lampoon, but this one is a mixture of sour grapes and pure wank.
notclueless 9-Feb-10 3:48pm
The reviewer has completely missed the intention of the device. This is a new category of electronic device. This is not an enterprise computer, and isn't intended to be. It is not intended to compete with Winbooks or Macintoshes or any other business device. So... don't even think of reviewing it as an enterprise device. What a waste of the publisher's money!
bccb 9-Feb-10 4:01pm
Well I was going to buy an iPad, but maybe I won't be able to get the product. Some countries allow pre-orders of the iPad. Now there is a report that pre-orders are no longer being permitted in some countries -- SOLD OUT. Maybe this is hype because how many units could these countries actually be assigned. But very interesting ... I guess it may be more difficult being an early adoptee if you actually can't get the device. Well I can always wait for iPad2.
skeptical observer 9-Feb-10 4:27pm
To quote Randall, "you could simply buy one of the myriad Windows 7 multitouch tablet PCs coming down the pike. This way you get all the benefits of the tablet form factor plus the full richness and fidelity of a local Windows user experience." Apparently, many people by Mac products because they don't want to experience, "the full richness and fidelity of a local Windows user experience." Someday, maybe Randall will realize there are other "experiences" out there that may be even more enjoyable than his "Windows World".
bccb 9-Feb-10 5:04pm
1 reply
Yes, I understand but do we care about OSs anymore? Will the machine email, browse, chat, present, etc. whatever. The answer is almost everything does these tasks ... even this iPad will probably do what we need. So the question comes down to what the interface looks like and are you are comfortable with it. The iPad seems to have the higher fun factor and it looks good ... like a supermodel ... compared to your next door neighbor (well most people's next door neighbor). I don't mean to be sexist but it seems to have a definite 'wow factor'. It looks smooth ... polished. OK it doesn't have be like this for you to get your job done ... it's your choice.
notclueless 10-Feb-10 12:20pm
Great analogy... iPad as the supermodel vs. the neighbor lady next door. Perhaps Randall and others like him are satisfied getting jiggy with the neighbor lady next door (Windoze) while the rest of us ogle the good stuff. It's just amazing that InfoWorld would let someone write such a misinformed piece.
BananaJr 10-Feb-10 3:01pm
The iPad is a terrible enterprise computing device? I'll tell you what is a terrible enterprise computing device. Windows Mobile. I have seen the exact same number of Windows Mobile devices on my office campus as iPads. Zero. Windows Mobile is so bad Randall writes about an unreleased product we shouldn't use instead of and unreleased Windows Mobile product we should use. If Randall's points held any water at all Windows Mobile should be succeeding handily in the business market. Instead it's lost almost half it's market share from a high of 11% in 2008. The facts are that Blackberrys and iPhones combined dominate the under $400 price point and Apple has outsold Windows 9 to 1 in the over $1,000 price point since June. Windows sweet spot is netbooks, laptops and desktops in the $400-$999 price point. The pundits predicted iPads would sell near the $900 price point. They don't. iPads sell squarely in Windows sweetspot. Will Randall buy one? Will you buy one? Will I buy one? Probably not. We can all figure out how to use PC's, Macs, iPhones and Blackberrys. My mother however still can't load pictures on her Windows PC and most likely neither can some of your relatives nor some of your sales staff or co workers. Most of the people I know who can't use Windows has seen the iPad and asks me if they are as easy to use as they look and how can they get one. Randall is going to be very depressed when he finds out how many people that adds up to, businesses or otherwise.
bccb 10-Feb-10 6:05pm
1 reply
ok ... I've made a decision ... I am going to go for the 64 GB with 3G. Boy it hurts to wait that extra month. I figure that I won't be using the 3G much but if the wifi isn't available and you absolutely need the connection then that extra cost+ATT is your insurance policy. On the other (Brett Favre) that black stripe at the top mars the beauty of the iPad. Would you choose: form over function or function over form?
chiguire 12-Feb-10 3:14am
2 replies
bccb, if the OS really then does not matter, save yourself over half of this investment and buy one of the other win7/android/propietary tablets out there (or coming at the same time). You'll have the same app functionality, and better "irons" (camera, expansion ports, HD, RAM) On the subject of multitasking, the issue is simple, if you had it, you would not need all the workarounds, nor would ask the developers to create new apps. The reason why it is not available is simply due to memory and performance issues with the iPhone, nothing to do with changing the paradigm of app development. The device (iPhone) simply can't support it. However, with the iPad carrying the A4 CPU, I would have expected all of this tech limitations to go away, and simply to support multitasking. For many uses and to enable many others. True that this is not a enterprise device, but if I take this to the university and want to run my math models in excel, these would run in the background, while I do other things (in the enterprise world, I would be extrating sales data over the net). Or if I want to do mail merges. For the photo fanatics, it takes a lot of time and CPU to synthetize several pictures into one. Some take so much time, that there are cloud services available for this. In the future (or once its delivered), if I wanted to create a peer-to-peer app, which would have many uses, and who knows, maybe I come out with the killer-app, then not having multi-tasking is then the app killer :) Apple needs to comes to ground on this, does not matter how fast you can make context-switching, at the end of the day, the cheapest and fastest app context switching model, IS multi-tasking.
bccb 15-Feb-10 1:43pm
Maybe you are correct ... but it sure looks pretty nice ... seems like they have come from another point of view. I really want to see it. It will probably be one in one of their bricks and mortar stores in our nearby mall. I can make the final decision if it does what I want ... no hurt in seeing it. For this type of device I just don't have the need to run 'math models'. I've got plenty of other hardware for that. I guess it would help if I they had a vnc app to get to those other machines but it really doesn't matter much. As far as multi-tasking is concerned I am not too concerned because it seems they have 'notification'(?). Anyway, you know, I think it is like having a microwave oven compared to a real oven. It won't replace the traditional oven (the PC) ... but I sure do a lot of warm-ups and beverages in my microwave (iPad?). And for future app development this could keep more people employed ... the apps will always need to be rewritten for new devices unless you are trying to limit the types of hardware and applications ... but coders are a malleable lot ... embedded devices, PCs, etc. etc. they love to program.
BananaJr 15-Feb-10 4:01pm
1 reply
chiguire, what you are describing is a content creation device. There are already plenty of desktops, laptops and netbooks for that and oh by the way they also multi task. Apple has not advertised this device as a content creation device. The iPad is primarily a content CONSUMPTION device. The two have very different purposes. This device isn't designed for you and I. It's designed for someone who wants instant on to read mail, webpages or books, watch video, show photos, use apps, play games and do light typing or updates in iWork or mail. Apple doesn't want the user to worry about file management, memory management or any other facet of a typical OS including closing multiple open apps. The lack of multi tasking as you describe it was intentional. The only multi tasking that is included is the abilty to listen to music while you read or get notifications in the background. Otherwise the state of whatever you opened is saved when you close it. End of Story. The iPhone and Touch have outsold lots of devices that multi task and I don't see how the lack of true multi tasking will blunt the sales of iPads either.
bccb 15-Feb-10 7:47pm
I didn't think it would play music/podcasts in the background. Even if that wasn't true it would still seem a 'minimum type of solution' with a high fun factor.

Today's Headlines: First Look Newsletter

Find out what will be news for the day, with our first-thing-in-the-morning briefing.

©1994-2010 Infoworld, Inc.