June 23, 2009

Microsoft enters the health care business

Your intrepid blogger draws some politically incorrect parallels between Microsoft's Security Essentials and the push toward universal health care

Is Microsoft's Security Essentials the new "universal health care" for Windows? I ask because every time I hear the company talk about its motivation for delivering MSE -- the millions of unprotected PCs being exploited by all manner of malware -- I can't help but draw comparisons to one or more Obama administration policy speeches.

[ For the latest security insights, read Roger Grimes' Security Adviser blog and Security Central newsletter. ]

Consider:

1. Universal health care is often described as a "single payer" system. In other words, the government pays for everything and you do your part by absorbing a hefty tax hike (assuming you pay any taxes to begin with -- many of the people who will benefit from universal health care don't).

Likewise, MSE is a single-payer system in that Microsoft is offering the tool for "free," though you and I will undoubtedly pay for it down the road when the true cost is rolled into future licensing fees and upgrades.

2. It offers a basic level of service. Universal health care isn't about delivering the best possible medicine to a majority of people; it's about delivering inadequate medical care to everyone, including the indigent. And, of course, those with the means to do so can always seek out the exceptional service of the old system through private doctors and clinics -- often in foreign countries (I hear India is a popular choice).

Likewise, MSE provides a basic level of protection. By all accounts, it gets the core functions right -- detecting and quarantining threats -- and even throws in some preventative medicine in the form of thrice-daily checks to the signature repository. And if you feel this level of care is inadequate, you can always shell out for one of the myriad third-party tools.

3. It's targeted at the neediest among us. The faces of the universal health care propaganda are typically the poor, often struggling single parents or recent immigrants (legal or otherwise) -- basically, the people clogging up your local emergency room on the weekends. The pitch is that many of these costly (to the taxpayer; see item 1 above) ER visits could have been prevented had they received regular care from a qualified medical professional.

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

White Paper

An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings

Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »

White Paper

Bringing the Edge to the Data Center

Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.

Download now »
zemto_freemis 23-Jun-09 6:25am
This post is off topic. Please move it to a political or health care forum.
I.Wannabe.Randall.Kennedy 23-Jun-09 8:08am
Completely out of line
Den2010 23-Jun-09 8:48am
Dear Randall-- Do you feel better now that you've gotten that bit of bile out of your system? Don't you just hate it that the debate was scored, and went a different way than you apparently wanted it to, last November? I'm not sure what the genesis was for your post, but it doesn't add anything to a discussion of the relative merits of Microsoft's product. Your political ruminations are no more than a repetition of the blather I hear from people who have nothing better to do than complain about the way things are now. I don't think that this forum is the right arena where they can be truly appreciated. You are certainly entitled to your opinions. The fact that you have a good platform from which to shout into your megaphone will no doubt make that opinion more widely heard. Congratulations. Can we get back to more technology-oriented material now?
JTB2468 23-Jun-09 8:52am
I give this post a hearty +1!
sandygettings 23-Jun-09 10:37am
Crappiest article on InfoWorld ever. Randall, your knowledge of the health care system is lacking, to a stunning degree. I hope your other "Enterprise Desktop" articles actually take the time to be based on facts, or there is no point in reading them. I don't know where to begin to debunk your lazy essay. But try this: Get off your employer-paid plan. Go buy comparable health coverage yourself from Aetna, Humana, or any major carrier. If you aren't turned down, it'll cost about $8K per year for a married middle-aged couple with good health habits and history. If you've gone to the doctor for anything significant in the past two years, or have any chronic problems, these problems will be excluded from your coverage. So, with deductibles, your care will cost you about $10K per year. Consider that the average US household earns abut $42K (see census.gov), about 1/4 of household income goes to health care. Do you pay for rent, food, clothing, and taxes, or pay for insurance? It's expensive for anyone, and unaffordable for many. Bottom line is that all other western industrial countries have some variation on universal care. They spend half as much as the U.S. on healthcare (premiums, plus out-of-pocket, plus related taxes), and every citizen is covered. The result? In most of these countries, the average life expectancy is a little longer and most other outcomes (e.g., disease incidence, infant mortality, and so on) are better as well. Live longer, live healthier, for half the cost. They can do it, why can't we do it in the US? I'll leave this question as an exercise for you. Copying rhetoric from Fox News is an automatic fail. Please don't write any more crap like this article. It'll make it too easy to cancel my subscription. Play him off, keyboard cat!
tdesmit 23-Jun-09 10:53am
It's hard to believe, but a post from Randall actually got me to register after years of lurking. I wholeheartedly agree with Randall, if only this one time...... P.S. Can't argue that using the Microsoft/Healthcare analogy is a thin disguise for a political post, but hey, it's his blog.....
RamboTribble 23-Jun-09 12:46pm
Of course, this opens the floodgates for Rush and his ilk to comment on tech. That should lead to a rich bi-directional flow of self-righteous ignorance and an untrammeled exchange of petty bombast.
rcprimak 23-Jun-09 1:03pm

Randall --

What you seem to forget, and where your analogy breaks down, is that there are already free antimalware and firewall and predictive security solutions out there. Microsoft is pitching a bad product into an already occupied sales space. Consider Avast, AVG Free, Zone Alarm Free, Comodo and Comodo CIS, AdAware, Spybot Search And Destroy, PC Tools Threatfire, Jettico Firewall, F-Secure Blacklight (a must for AVG Free users, as AVG stripped out anti-rootkit from their free product two versions ago), and a host of on line on-demand scanners, some of which actually remove what they report. Not to mention browser plug-ins for added security -- all free.

Unlike health insurance, there is already a well-developed community of free and low-cost security products out there. Microsoft is trying to reinvent the wheel, and they are coming up with a square wheel. There is no affordability crisis in PC security for home or small business users, if one does just a little research.

Please stick to topics on which a common end-user cannot run circles around you.

bobbymyles 30-Jun-09 11:06am
And how do you think those poor, non-tax payers are supposed to get good preventive care? I wonder what you would say if you lacked good health care coverage? DON'T quit you day job (you'll lose your health coverage and may thn become a burden on the almighty taxpayer), stay out of politics and public policy, your simplistic "analysis" demonstrates you don't have the brains...stick to writing your nonsense on tech issues...

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Today's Headlines: First Look Newsletter

Find out what will be news for the day, with our first-thing-in-the-morning briefing.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.