October 30, 2009

32-bit Windows 7 or 64-bit Windows 7?

The right choice of Windows 7 versions depends on a number of factors. Let InfoWorld's bitwise FAQ be your guide

For most would-be Windows 7 users, a 64-bit version of Windows 7 is the right move. But if you don't have sufficient RAM (at least 4GB), or you rely on devices that don't have supporting 64-bit drivers, or you need to upgrade an existing 32-bit installation, 32-bit Windows 7 might be the better choice. A few editions of 64-bit Windows 7 provide a Windows XP Mode that solves some backward-compatibility problems, but it isn't a universal panacea. In speedy Q&A format, here's just what you need to know.

Q. Is my PC supported under 64-bit Windows 7?
A. Most PCs manufactured in the past three years (i.e. after Vista's debut) are capable of running 64-bit Windows 7. The exceptions are those that ship with low-end CPUs that don't support the AMD or Intel 64-bit extensions. Examples include Intel's Atom line of low-powered CPUs and early Intel Core CPUs, like the Core Duo (not Core 2 Duo). If you're not sure what kind of CPU is in your system, or whether the CPU supports 64-bit operation, you can use the free Intel Processor Identification Utility to find out.

[ See what Windows stole from Mac OS X. See what Mac OS X stole from Windows. | Discover the top 10 free open source apps for Windows]

Q. What about all of my peripherals?
A.
As with PC support, most peripherals manufactured in the Vista era work with 64-bit Windows 7. However, legacy hardware support is a hit-or-miss proposition. Some manufacturers -- for example, vendors of network interface cards or disk storage controllers -- are more up to date than others, thanks in part to the fact that they've been supporting 64-bit computing under Windows Server since the 2002-2003 timeframe. Devices that don't have obvious ties to the datacenter (such as custom input devices, multimedia hardware, and some printers) can be harder to integrate since they were manufactured at a time when 64-bit desktops were a rarity. Your best bet is to do a Web search to see if the manufacturer has published a 64-bit device driver and, barring that, if other users have come up with a solution.

additional resources
White Paper - How to Improve Delivery of Advanced Web Applications

White Paper

Virtual Workforce: The Key to Expanding The Business While Cutting Costs

Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.

Go inside:
The three-step approach to making a virtual workforce a reality.
The four flavors of client virtualization technologies.
The three key initiatives that solve IT challenges.
Download now »
White Paper: Successfully Secure Your Wireless LAN With Wi-Fi firewalls.

White Paper

Addressing Linux Threats Leveraging Fewer Resources

The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.

Download now »
White Paper - The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

White Paper

The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.

Download now »
White Paper - Is Your Backup System Outdated?

White Paper

Mid-range Storage Considerations

A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.

Download now »
lawryll 30-Oct-09 7:14am
Wow. In the months I've been reading Randall's articles, they have steadily declined into embarassing reads. Endless rants about the nitpickiest details, no solutions whatsoever, and they probably took all of 30 minutes to write.

Here we have an actual decent article. It goes into a number of considerations. Although half of this information is easily accessible via the Windows 7 home page site, you actually took some time to add some additional thoughts and supplement the answers.

Most importantly, we didn't hear an endless tirade against something. We are absolutely sick of hearing things wrong with OS's and just want someone to help us understand things better and provide solutions.

I didn't think I'd say this, but - Thank you Randall. This is the first article in a long time you've spent more than a few minutes preparing for...and it was actually useful information rather than just crap.
DaveN 30-Oct-09 10:19am
Very informative, thanks. The other day I was on dell.com helping a co-worker spec out a new PC for home use, and it was interesting to see that many of the models are offering only 64-bit Win7. The business side seems to be offering the choice, but for home, they're pushing 64-bit.
graya 30-Oct-09 11:45am
32 bit should have never came out. If you don't want 64 bit don't get a computer. You only get 32 bit if you don't plan on using more then a browser. Eventually programs will require more ram becasue of 64 bit. This is just another bad article by Randell that only lives in the past with new hardware. People just aren't smart enought to get programs to run on 64 bit, becasue all my 32 bit app have worked fine on 64 bit systems, never had any troubles.
RealGomer 30-Oct-09 1:02pm
Maybe I missed something but I could not even install 32 bit drivers for my Canon CanoScan 3200f scanner.into the VPC Windows XP. I kept getting error messages saying the driver was 32 bit and then the install would die and close. Maybe it's the fact I'm using Win7/64 Ultra RC Build 7100. I have a scanner that is perfect for my purposes but Canon has decided to not create 64 bit drivers. I tried for the better of a month using Vista drivers, newer model drivers, VueScan, nothing. So I either throw out a perfectly good scanner and buy a new one (yea, right) or never use a scanner on my PC again.
OldestWinUserEver 30-Oct-09 2:43pm
I'm entirely behind 64 bit windows and hope with the release of Windows 7, publishers will start releasing 64 bit versions of their softtware. The problem is where to find it. I have been on at least a dozen websites looking for fully compatible WIndows 64 bit software and until the last few days, every referenced site listed on Google for a site with a full catalog of downloadable freeware or shareware, was a joke. But I did find Windows-64.com referenced by a Microsoft MVP... And thank you from other Infoworld for the reference on Directory Opus 64 bit version on Directoryopus.com. Awesome tool on 64 bit Windows.
lcarliner 31-Oct-09 5:39am
Just a note to say that Laplink's PC Mover works superbly in moving programs and data from a 32-bit machine and operating system. Just one precaution: Before starting the move, identify any programs on the 32-bit system that is already supplied by Microsoft, like the games and other utilities and delete these or exclude them, as the older version will not work in the new computer. Louis. . . .
InnocentBystander 1-Nov-09 11:55pm
Great story, RK. This is helpful and I appreciate it. But I'm confused over the other guy at InfoWorld who's using your name. ???
noseph 2-Nov-09 2:02am
Not all Atom processors are created equal. I have five nettops with Atom 330 Dual Core processors and they all are x64 capable.
TechieXP 2-Nov-09 5:54pm
I think you may be mistaken about Virtual PC. Virtual PC is a free solution from MSFT that was bought from Connectix. It is a full virtualization application like open source VirtualBox. Vitual PC can run in Windows based operating system and many non-linux ones as well. The requirements are as follows. If you are using a 32bit version as the host, you can only install a 32bit guess operating system. If you are using a 64bit host, you can install a 32bit and 64bit guess. This is true of many Virtualization softwares that I have used. As I am typing this I am running Windows 7 Ultimate x64 and I am installing Windows 7 Enterprise Edition using MSFT Virtual PC..i even recorded it for you - www.designsbytj.net/vpc.wmv If you were correct I am sure the software would not even let me install it... The only additional requirements that need to be met is if you want to use XP Mode. XP Mode as you said is very special and here is why. if you don't want to you certainly don't have to download MSFT's XP Mode virtual drive. You can simply create your own XP guess operating system for XP manually. The difference is you won;t get the soecialized benefits you get with what MSFT create. The one MSFT made has special features that basically integrate XP into Windows 7. If you install an application into XP Mode, it will run inside Windows 7 as if it was installed in Windows 7.
quadibloc 2-Nov-09 6:27pm
Unfortunately, there apparently are architectural limitations in the way 64-bit operation is implemented on Intel and AMD chips that have created the problem. This situation is reminiscent of protected mode on the 286 chip. Hopefully, it can be remedied at that end, and Microsoft will take advantage of it when it is, so that people can buy one copy of Windows, and seamlessly run 16-bit, 32-bit, and 64-bit software. And, better yet, it would be nice if people could any hardware that came with drivers for any version of Windows ever, with no compatibility problems, but admittedly that would be harder to achieve.

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Today's Headlines: First Look Newsletter

Find out what will be news for the day, with our first-thing-in-the-morning briefing.

©1994-2010 Infoworld, Inc.