September 16, 2008

Will Apple ever liberalize Mac OS X virtualization?

Customers are clamoring to virtualize the Mac OS X client, but Apple has only grudgingly allowed it to be run on virtual machines

Over the past two years, running Windows and Windows apps virtually on Apple hardware has become a popular way for consumers to dump their PCs in favor of Mac gear.

Microsoft's liberal attitude, while hurting hardware partners such as HP and Dell, has also enabled the spread of Windows to Apple's previously-inaccessible hardware.

[ Stay up to date on the latest virtualization developments with InfoWorld's Virtualization Report blog and newsletter. ]

In contrast, Apple has only grudgingly allowed Mac OS X to be run on virtual machines. The regular client version of Leopard cannot be run virtually, whether on Apple's hardware or not.

Only the server version of Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard can be turned into a virtual machine, or guest. That must be on Mac hardware, though desktops, laptops or servers are all allowed. The VMs must also run on top of the base Leopard server OS.

The implications of these limitations on price are huge. It costs a minimum of $499 -- the retail price for Apple's smallest 10-pack of OS X Server Leopard licenses -- to run Leopard virtually today. Meanwhile, a 5-pack of regular Leopard licenses retails for $129.

Pete Kazanjy, marketing manager for VMware's Fusion (read First Look: VMware Fusion 2.0 Beta 1) Mac-Windows virtualization software, says that from a technical standpoint, there's "no difference" between the client and server versions of Leopard.

Users have not been stopped by the barriers to circumventing Apple's license.

A small vendor, DiscCloud, released software last month it claims can be used to legally enable non-Apple PC servers to host Leopard-client virtual machines.

"It's on a lot of peoples' minds," said Kazanjy. "Apple has built its business model of pairing really wonderful hardware with their wonderful software. They are really leery of letting things slide in there."

"We've heard requests from our customers" to virtualize the Leopard client, said Ray Chew, senior product manager at Parallels, which earlier this summer released the first software to enable Leopard Server to be virtualized. "We have to tell them you can't do anything against Apple's EULA [End User License Agreement.]"

Close

On Twitter now

Platforms

Powered by Twitter

On Twitter now

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

White Paper

An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings

Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »

White Paper

Bringing the Edge to the Data Center

Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.

Download now »

Subscribe to the Virtualization Newsletter

Receive a weekly digest of the latest news, analysis, views, and opinions about the growing world of virtualization.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.