Authors and artists seeking to release works under a Creative Commons license now have more flexibility and choice when they want to share their works, Creative Commons said Thursday.
Creative Commons licenses allow copyright holders to easily grant permission to use their works in certain manners. Version 4.0 of the licenses were introduced Tuesday after a two-year development period in which legal experts around the world collaborated to renew and refine the license, the organization announced in a blog post.
[ Simon Phipps tells it like it is: Why software patents are evil. | For a quick, smart take on the news you'll be talking about, check out InfoWorld TechBrief -- subscribe today. | Read Bill Snyder's Tech's Bottom Line blog for what the key business trends mean to you. ]
While most of the dozens of improvements will go unnoticed by Creative Commons licensors and licensees, the new licenses are more user-friendly and more internationally robust than ever before, the organization said.
Creative Commons offers six standard licenses with which authors, artists, scientists, teachers and other creatives can manage their copyrights flexibly. With the standard licenses the users decide to what extent their work is allowed to be spread and edited, and under which conditions. The user does not entirely give up the copyright but rather grants certain user rights in advance so third parties do not explicitly need to ask for permission for using or adapting the work.
One of the main improvements for users is that the 4.0 license allows them to enable more anonymity, said Lisette Kalshoven , advisor for copyright and heritage at the Dutch organization Kennisland (Knowledgeland). Kennisland is the public project lead for Creative Commons Netherlands and coordinates the public activities of Creative Commons in the Netherlands.
Version 3.0 of the license allowed a licensor to request a licensee to remove attribution from an adaptation of the work. That provision is expanded in the new license and now applies not just to adaptations but also to reproductions.
This means that licensors can choose when they want attribution for their work, said Kalshoven. The licenses now account for situations where licensors wish to disassociate themselves from uses of their works they object to, even if their work hasn't been modified or published in a collection with other works.
Another important change is the introduction of a 30-day window in which license violations can be corrected, Kalshoven said. All Creative Commons licenses are terminated when a licensee breaks the terms, but under the new licenses, licensees' rights are reinstated automatically if they correct a breach within 30 days of discovering it. This assures accidental violators they can keep using the work without having to worry they might lose the rights to do so permanently.
Granting a violator of the terms some leeway already happened in practice, for instance when somebodies name was spelled wrong in the attribution, said Kalshoven.
Another change that might be welcomed by users is that the text of the licenses has become much more readable, Kalshoven said. "In the new version the license text is completely restructured and rewritten in such a way that it is readable for people who are not lawyers," said Kalshoven.