Cloud storage services will provide slow but extremely low-cost archiving services to reduce the in-house storage load. Amazon Glacier, for example, costs as little as 1 cent per gigabyte per month. While "it could take three to five hours to retrieve that data," that might be no longer than it would take to restore data from tape stored offsite -- and Glacier would be cost-competitive with tape, says Greg Schulz, founder of consultancy StorageIO.
"Object stores can reduce storage costs and complexity by eliminating the need for hierarchical file systems," says Gladwin. "In a very large data storage system, running a file system [requires] additional racks of servers" that consume power, take up space and cost money. With an object store, he says, an application such as a social media website lets a user search for friends without using a file system.
Meanwhile, IT shops continue to be drawn to the cloud's combination of cost efficiencies, low-cost hardware and low-cost, open-source software.
Constant Contact, for example, is considering "private storage clouds," possibly using open-source software, on the system of a provider such as Amazon S3, for the low costs and "almost unlimited horizontal scale" they can deliver, says Piesche. Using Cassandra, for example, he says he would like to scatter storage clusters among distributed data centers for disaster recovery "without any licensing costs, without any complicated setup and without any manual intervention."
The replication capabilities he needs aren't available yet. But he has to keep looking because, as Schulz says, "For the vast majority of people there's no such thing as a data recession."
Scheier is a veteran technology writer. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Read more about data storage in Computerworld's Data Storage Topic Center.