Zero-day Windows bug problem worse than first thought, says security expert
'Most every Windows application' is at risk, according to the security firm working with Microsoft on a fix
An unpatched problem with Windows applications is much worse than first thought, with hundreds of programs, not just 40, vulnerable to attack, a Slovenian security company said today.
"It was a shocking surprise," said Mitja Kolsek, CEO of Acros Security. "It appears that most every Windows application has this vulnerability."
[ Stay ahead of the key tech business news with InfoWorld's Today's Headlines: First Look newsletter. | Master your security with InfoWorld's interactive Security iGuide. | Stay up to date on the latest security developments with InfoWorld's Security Central newsletter. ]
Yesterday, American researcher HD Moore announced that he had stumbled on about 40 Windows applications with a common vulnerability, but declined to name the programs or go into detail about the bug.
Today, Kolsek said that Acros has been digging into a new class of vulnerabilities for months, has found more than 200 flawed applications harboring more than 500 separate bugs, and reported its findings to Microsoft more than four months ago.
In other words, the problem is much more widespread than Moore let on Wednesday.
"We examined a bunch of applications, more than 220 from about 100 leading software vendors, and found that most every one had the vulnerability," said Kolsek. Acros built a specialized tool to help its researchers pinpoint which applications were vulnerable.
According to Kolsek, the bug is in how most applications load and execute code libraries -- ".dll" files in Windows -- and executables, including ".exe" and ".com" files. He dubbed the class of bugs as "remote binary planting," and said the flaws could be easily exploited.
"The main enabler for this attack is the fact that Windows includes the current working directory in the search order when loading executables," he said. Hackers can use that to trick a wide range of Windows applications into loading malicious files, just as they normally do their own .dll or .exe files.
Most Windows applications rely on the functionality to operate, a problem that may prevent Microsoft from issuing a single patch. Although Microsoft could patch Windows to change the functionality, Kolsek at one point said he believed that such a fix could break scores of applications.
Later in the interview, however, Kolsek seemed to waffle. "I'm very confident that Microsoft will come up with a solution that will work fairly well for most people," he said. "But it's not going to remove the problem."
If Microsoft doesn't come up with a fix, application vendors may have to issue separate patches, a stance that Moore, the CTO of Rapid7 and creator of the open-source Metasploit penetration testing toolkit, took Wednesday. Another option may be for Microsoft to issue an update targeted at developers, who would then use it to patch their own code, a tactic used two years ago when it addressed a bug in the ATL (Active Template Library) code library.
