Sun's Thorsten Ziehm of the OpenOffice.org engineering team wrote a post titled "Does OpenOffice.org 3.x have a general quality issue?"
Unless my mind is playing tricks on me, and I'm 98.2 percent sure it isn't, Thorsten's post was edited between when I first read it in the morning and when I decided to blog this afternoon. The edits seem to have removed any suggestion that OpenOffice.org could have a quality issue. Even in the original version of the post Thorsten had concluded that OpenOffice.org does not have a general quality issue.
[ Keep up with the latest open source news with InfoWorld's open source newsletter and topic center. ]
But in the original version, he did discuss some information that could point to a quality issue. For instance, the original showed that the total bugs reports had grown to over 13,000, of which about 3,000 were new feature requests. If memory serves me right, the defects and total numbers were much higher than previous releases. But with more OpenOffice.org users, this increase did not point to a quality issue by itself.
Thorsten concludes that there may not be a general quality issue with OpenOffice.org, but other goals remain:
We have to work still on stabilizing the existing functionality instead of concentrating on newer functionality only.
This is a similar conclusion that Andre Schnabel comes to in his reply to Thorsten's post (not sure if Andre's reply was to version 1 or version 2 of Thorsten's post):
While one may argue (endless) if the product as a quality issue or not, the real point is, that the OOo project's process of identifying, handling and finally fixing bugs is not really satisfying.
Andre goes on to conclude that we can make OpenOffice.org better:
- joint and better coordinated efforts from QA and development to *fix* bugs
- the common goal of the project to work on bugfixing (instead of the separate statement of the QA project that fixing bugs is not within our responsibility)
- the commitment to fix bugs even in old features (and not only regressions). Each feature once was new. Following our current policy you just need to wait long enough to counter the regression argument.
Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.
The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.
Download now »
Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.
Download now »
A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.
Download now »
Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts
273 Recommendations
