October 21, 2009

MySQL co-founder questions viability of MySQL fork to protect users

Ex-MySQL leaders take opposite stances in EU-vs.-Oracle discussion

MySQL's ex-CEO Marten Mickos and MySQL co-founder Michael "Monty" Widenius recently released open letters to the EU. Marten supports the Oracle acquisition of MySQL, as part of the Sun deal. Monty urges the EU to block MySQL from being controlled by Oracle.

Considering their points of view, I'm no longer convinced that the EU should just approve the acquisition and let market forces take over. In the long run, I think, and hope, that Oracle will act in its best interests, and those interests will align with MySQL customer interests -- emphasis on "I think" and "hope."

[ MySQL co-founder and creator Michael "Monty" Widenius has said Oracle should sell the database. | Oracle's Larry Ellison last week offered reassurances that Sun technologies will not go away. ]

Let me start with Marten's conclusion as to why the EU should allow the Oracle acquisition:

I believe that Oracle's acquisition of Sun (and MySQL) will increase competition in the database market. And I also believe that if, on the other hand, it becomes difficult or impossible for large companies to acquire open-source assets, then venture investments in open-source companies will slow down, harming the evolution of and innovation in open source, which would result in decreased competition.

I completely agree with Marten here. If open source vendors and their VCs aren't able to sell to larger companies, who may or may not be competitors, then open source investments will be negatively impacted. Closed source vendors have purchased their closed source competition in the past. And yes, the acquiring vendor has, more often than not, migrated the customers to the acquiring vendor's product. Should Oracle attempt this with MySQL, proponents of the deal argue that MySQL customers have several options from other firms providing MySQL support and services. To this end, Marten writes:

...the few thousand customers of the MySQL Enterprise subscription offering.

additional resources
White Paper - How to Improve Delivery of Advanced Web Applications

White Paper

Virtual Workforce: The Key to Expanding The Business While Cutting Costs

Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.

Go inside:
The three-step approach to making a virtual workforce a reality.
The four flavors of client virtualization technologies.
The three key initiatives that solve IT challenges.
Download now »
White Paper: Successfully Secure Your Wireless LAN With Wi-Fi firewalls.

White Paper

Addressing Linux Threats Leveraging Fewer Resources

The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.

Download now »
White Paper - The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

White Paper

The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.

Download now »
White Paper - Is Your Backup System Outdated?

White Paper

Mid-range Storage Considerations

A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.

Download now »
Open_source_activist 21-Oct-09 5:39pm
Thanks for your excellent analyse! A couple of comments: About: "it becomes difficult or impossible for large companies to acquire open-source assets" Open source vendors and their VC's has the same rights and restrictions as a closed source vendor when it comes to sell their assets to another company; Not more and not less. The issue at hand has nothing to with Open Source. The same problem would exist if MySQL would be a closed source product. The question is if we should allow a company to buy a product that competes with the companys main, very profitable, product when there is positive evidence that that the competition between the products has lead to greatly reduced prices in the market. One of the main securities for investors when it comes to invest into open source companies producing GPL software, is that the GPL gives the company a very tight control on any partners that works with them on the product and any companies that needs to distribute the product with their closed source software. If investors would belive that it would be trivial for another company to fork a product and take over the business, there would be very little investment happening in Open Source. GPL is thus a protection for the investment and things are good for the users when the company that holds the copyright holder benefits from keeping the product alive. This has made GPL one of the most attractive licenses when doing business in Open Source. The back side is that if the copyright holder would benefit from killing the product, then the GPL will help them do that. With no way to license the code or do closed source addons, there will be much less interest for commercial entities to work on the project. It's extremely hard to fork a GPL project, as there is very limited ways to make enough money on it to be able to develop it. Over time, the project will be taken over by another project with allows commercial partners to participate. In other words, for a GPL product like MySQL, the ability for fork the code is not enough protection to ensure that someone else will be able to afford to take up the pieces and afford to develop the product forward in a pace the that market require. It's easy to set up another support offering around a GPL product; Creating a separate development line is much harder, in many cases impossible as the options to make money are very limited.

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Today's Headlines: First Look Newsletter

Find out what will be news for the day, with our first-thing-in-the-morning briefing.

©1994-2010 Infoworld, Inc.