October 21, 2009

MySQL co-founder questions viability of MySQL fork to protect users

Ex-MySQL leaders take opposite stances in EU-vs.-Oracle discussion

MySQL's ex-CEO Marten Mickos and MySQL co-founder Michael "Monty" Widenius recently released open letters to the EU. Marten supports the Oracle acquisition of MySQL, as part of the Sun deal. Monty urges the EU to block MySQL from being controlled by Oracle.

Considering their points of view, I'm no longer convinced that the EU should just approve the acquisition and let market forces take over. In the long run, I think, and hope, that Oracle will act in its best interests, and those interests will align with MySQL customer interests -- emphasis on "I think" and "hope."

[ MySQL co-founder and creator Michael "Monty" Widenius has said Oracle should sell the database. | Oracle's Larry Ellison last week offered reassurances that Sun technologies will not go away. ]

Let me start with Marten's conclusion as to why the EU should allow the Oracle acquisition:

I believe that Oracle's acquisition of Sun (and MySQL) will increase competition in the database market. And I also believe that if, on the other hand, it becomes difficult or impossible for large companies to acquire open-source assets, then venture investments in open-source companies will slow down, harming the evolution of and innovation in open source, which would result in decreased competition.

I completely agree with Marten here. If open source vendors and their VCs aren't able to sell to larger companies, who may or may not be competitors, then open source investments will be negatively impacted. Closed source vendors have purchased their closed source competition in the past. And yes, the acquiring vendor has, more often than not, migrated the customers to the acquiring vendor's product. Should Oracle attempt this with MySQL, proponents of the deal argue that MySQL customers have several options from other firms providing MySQL support and services. To this end, Marten writes:

...the few thousand customers of the MySQL Enterprise subscription offering.

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

White Paper

An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings

Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »

White Paper

Bringing the Edge to the Data Center

Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.

Download now »
Open_source_activist 21-Oct-09 5:39pm
Thanks for your excellent analyse! A couple of comments: About: "it becomes difficult or impossible for large companies to acquire open-source assets" Open source vendors and their VC's has the same rights and restrictions as a closed source vendor when it comes to sell their assets to another company; Not more and not less. The issue at hand has nothing to with Open Source. The same problem would exist if MySQL would be a closed source product. The question is if we should allow a company to buy a product that competes with the companys main, very profitable, product when there is positive evidence that that the competition between the products has lead to greatly reduced prices in the market. One of the main securities for investors when it comes to invest into open source companies producing GPL software, is that the GPL gives the company a very tight control on any partners that works with them on the product and any companies that needs to distribute the product with their closed source software. If investors would belive that it would be trivial for another company to fork a product and take over the business, there would be very little investment happening in Open Source. GPL is thus a protection for the investment and things are good for the users when the company that holds the copyright holder benefits from keeping the product alive. This has made GPL one of the most attractive licenses when doing business in Open Source. The back side is that if the copyright holder would benefit from killing the product, then the GPL will help them do that. With no way to license the code or do closed source addons, there will be much less interest for commercial entities to work on the project. It's extremely hard to fork a GPL project, as there is very limited ways to make enough money on it to be able to develop it. Over time, the project will be taken over by another project with allows commercial partners to participate. In other words, for a GPL product like MySQL, the ability for fork the code is not enough protection to ensure that someone else will be able to afford to take up the pieces and afford to develop the product forward in a pace the that market require. It's easy to set up another support offering around a GPL product; Creating a separate development line is much harder, in many cases impossible as the options to make money are very limited.

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Today's Headlines: First Look Newsletter

Find out what will be news for the day, with our first-thing-in-the-morning briefing.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.