May 28, 2009

Linux growing, Windows declining among Eclipse users

Results from Eclipse Survey 2009 show Linux growth on the developer desktop and production environments -- at Microsoft's expense

Ian Skerrett just posted six insights from the Eclipse community survey. They're all very interesting, but Insight No. 1 is really surprising. Ian writes: "Insight #1 – Linux is doing really well at the expense of Windows." Ian bases this on the following data:

It's long been held that developers build applications on Windows regardless of which operating system the (server side) application will be deployed on. This Eclipse data suggests a change might be under way.

[ Though Linux gains traction with developers, InfoWorld's Neil McAllister argues desktop Linux may have lost its chance | Keep up on the latest open source developments with InfoWorld's open source topic center and newsletter. ]

Is anyone else surprised that nearly half (27 percent vs. 64 percent) as many Eclipse users build applications on Linux as they do on Windows? Frankly, I've worked with more customers whose developers build applications on Mac OS X than on Linux; emphasis on the word "on" versus "for." Nonetheless, this data should definitely get some attention from folks at Microsoft.

Yes, these results are based on Eclipse users and do not account for the Visual Studio developers who are 100 percent on Windows. But let's say Eclipse and Eclipse-based tooling is used by (as little as?) one-third of all enterprise developers; it's still a large enough audience that Microsoft needs to keep on Windows. Maybe there's work that Microsoft could do to optimize Eclipse for Windows, much like Microsoft has done with PHP and Windows?

More worrisome (to Microsoft) is the fact that Linux has secured the No. 1 position for deployment operating systems among Eclipse users. In related news, Sun Solaris/OpenSolaris fared no better, declining from 8 percent in 2007 to 5.2 percent in 2009. My data analysis spidey senses are tingling. I'd love to have more time with this data! But alas, life calls...

Follow me on Twitter at: SavioRodrigues

P.S.: I should state: "The postings on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies, or opinions."

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

White Paper

An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings

Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »

White Paper

Bringing the Edge to the Data Center

Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.

Download now »
slontz 29-May-09 9:17am
This is a really, *really*, poor use of statistics for analysis. -Why does Windows care about its adoption as a development or deployment OS among Eclipse users? Platform technology choice more surely drives the choice of IDE than can be said for the converse. -As a corollary, how is a gain by Linux developers at "the expense" of Windows developers? It's not a zero-sum game. Shouldn't Eclipse be worried about the loss of *any* developers? Doesn't this say that Windows developers (and more importantly the enterprises who employ them) are flocking to Visual Studio? -A more pertinent question to ask is what's the change in developer-base size, in real numbers not percentage, over the same time for Windows and Linux? -Here's another one: what's the real change in enterprise-level server-side applications being planned for Windows vs Linux as a deployment OS? I'm agnostic when it comes to the technologies in question. I've used and continue to advocate both, depending on circumstances, but I abhor misleading use of statistics.
Gray_Hair 29-May-09 2:05pm
Even worst, this data is not from any valid statistical sample but extrapolated from survey results! The most generous thing I can say is the table is semantically NULL.

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Today's Headlines: First Look Newsletter

Find out what will be news for the day, with our first-thing-in-the-morning briefing.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.