Seven months after dismissing OpenDaylight, HP has raised its membership in the vendor-driven open source SDN consortium to its highest and most expensive tier.
HP is now a Platinum member of OpenDaylight, raising its status from a lower tier Silver member, which it has been since the consortium formed a little over a year ago. HP has upped its investment and participation in OpenDaylight because open source software-defined networking is "completely consistent" with what HP has been doing in terms of openness, interoperability and standards, says Sarwar Raza, director of cloud networking and SDN, HP Networking.
[ PathSolutions solves the network monitoring maze -- and nets an InfoWorld Test Center Editor's Choice. | Pick up expert networking how-to advice from InfoWorld's Networking Deep Dive PDF special report and Technology: Networking newsletter. ]
"OpenDaylight is at a stage where the collaborative approach provides a great forum to promote interoperability and openness," Raza says. "Our strategy is to drive an open ecosystem...and embrace open source as a way of getting things done."
+ MORE ON NETWORK WORLD: Everyone wants open source SDNs +
What's interesting is that just last fall, HP dismissed open sourcing SDNs, and OpenDaylight. Ex-HPer Mike Banic had said when he was vice president of global marketing for HP Networking that open sourcing SDNs was "wrong" because it means passing the burden and investment of ensuring enterprise-class functionality, reliability and performance onto the customer.
And Bethany Mayer, formerly senior vice president and general manager of HP Networking (who has transitioned to a new role at the company), said at that time she didn't know why customers would use an OpenDaylight controller.
"Using an open source controller in the enterprise can be tricky and dangerous," Mayer said at last fall's Interop New York conference.
(Mayer's former role in HP Networking has reportedly been filled by Antonio Neri, previously senior vice president of technology services.)
Raza says HP's heightened role in OpenDaylight is not a reversal of the company's viewpoint on open source SDNs and OpenDaylight. Rather, Banic and Mayer's comments were misinterpreted.
"I think that those comments were taken out of context," Raza says, even though HP did not express such sentiments at the time they were published. "There is no fundamental shift on HP's part" with regard to open sourcing SDNs.Raza says there is nothing wrong with open source itself. But customers are not willing or comfortable with downloading an open source controller.
OpenDaylight is putting some commercial-grade enrichment on open source SDNs, Raza says.
"It's in commercial variants with quality assurance cycles and vendor backing," he says. "It's integrated and packaged instead of from the tree."