September 24, 2009

How to avoid the smartphone Exchange policy lie

Just because a mobile device says it supports Exchange policies doesn't mean it does. Case in point: Apple's iPhone

The recent revelation that Apple's iPhone OS had been falsely reporting to Exchange servers that iPhones and iPod Touches provided on-device encryption when in fact they did not has raised several questions regarding mobile device support for EAS (Exchange ActiveSync) policies -- vital safeguards many businesses employ to secure access to corporate information, whether to meet specific regulations or as a matter of general security prudence.

As it turns out, information on EAS policy support among mobile devices is not easy to come by. Also not easy is ascertaining what exactly will happen when an Exchange server is configured to use a policy that any given mobile device may or may not support.

[ The InfoWorld Test Center evaluates just what Apple's iPhone Configuration Tool can manage. | Read the "7 myths about iPhone Exchange policies" that users often believe. ]

Here's what IT can do to ensure the EAS policy compliance of users' mobile devices.

What EAS policies the devices really do support
Exchange ActiveSync 2007 supports 29 access and security policies that IT can enable. (To get the details on the policies and their values, check out Microsoft's documentation for Exchange Server 2007 policies.)

Just a handful of mobile devices support at least some EAS policies: Apple's iPhone; smartphones using Microsoft's Windows Mobile OS; Nokia's E and N series, as well as the S60 through a download; and Palm's WebOS, along with its defunct Palm OS.

Windows Mobile 6.1 supports all 29 policies, though an Exchange enterprise license is needed for 14 of them. Apple and Nokia did not respond to InfoWorld's request to list specifically what EAS policies their devices support; a Palm spokeswoman was unable to find the information even after several days. (Update: I finally got an answer from Palm eight weeks later, confirming the information below.) All three companies have published limited information on their Web sites:

Read more about mobilize in InfoWorld's Mobilize Channel.

Close

On Twitter now

Mobile device management

Powered by Twitter
additional resources
White Paper - How to Improve Delivery of Advanced Web Applications

White Paper

Virtual Workforce: The Key to Expanding The Business While Cutting Costs

Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.

Go inside:
The three-step approach to making a virtual workforce a reality.
The four flavors of client virtualization technologies.
The three key initiatives that solve IT challenges.
Download now »
White Paper: Successfully Secure Your Wireless LAN With Wi-Fi firewalls.

White Paper

Addressing Linux Threats Leveraging Fewer Resources

The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.

Download now »
White Paper - The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

White Paper

The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.

Download now »
White Paper - Is Your Backup System Outdated?

White Paper

Mid-range Storage Considerations

A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.

Download now »
lawryll 24-Sep-09 7:02am
2 replies
Galen, I can't help but wonder...if security was so important, why did Microsoft rely on the device to report back it was safe? Wouldn't this allow any device that wasn't secure to simply tell Exchange it was and Exchange goes, "Okay...cool!"? I'm no Sherlock Holmes, but if you are going to put the blame on Apple for "lying" to Exchange, then you also need to put blame on Microsoft for not allowing a mechanism to verify the device encryption. This is just another ill-thought out security scheme by Microsoft that allows for ANY device to lie to Exchange and Exchange just accepts it. This isn't an Apple-specific problem. This is a Microsoft-specific problem and Microsoft needs to fix Exchange so that it verifies encryption is functioning on the device before authorizing it.
SterlingNorth 24-Sep-09 9:29am
I don't see how it would be possible to verify device encryption unless Microsoft actually reversed engineered each device to see how they store information on its device. And it would be a cold day in hell before Apple (or any MS competitor) allowed Microsoft to do such a thing.
MAS 25-Sep-09 5:13am
So, how exactly is Microsoft at fault for Apple lying to *customers* that their device is doing what it should?

This has little to do with the client/server system and all about truth in advertising.

As far as client/server is concerned, how exactly is the client supposed to confirm to the server that the data is encrypted?

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Mobilize Newsletter

Receive the latest news, reviews and discussions on everything mobile.

©1994-2010 Infoworld, Inc.