May 26, 2009

Deathmatch: BlackBerry versus iPhone

It’s time for us to bury the BlackBerry and move on to modern mobile -- even for e-mail

Editor's note: With the iPhone OS 3.0 released on June 11, we have revised this review to include the iPhone's new capabilities. Read our updated comparison "Deathmatch rematch: BlackBerry versus iPhone 3.0" for the current comparison. Continue reading the story below for the comparison based on the iPhone 2.x OS.

Look at any major analyst firm report since the Apple iPhone was released, and you'll see the earnest intoning to stick with the buttoned-down and pinstriped BlackBerry -- widely admired in executive corridors for its safety and security -- and beware that odd, colorful, possibly dangerous Apple device that consumers may love but professionals should avoid. If the iPhone were meant for work, it wouldn't be so much fun to use, would it?

Yes, it was Mac versus PC all over again: The iPhone was quickly pigeonholed as a fun, polished device for the cool kids to play with versus the RIM BlackBerry's rep as a corporate standard designed to get work done. As with the Mac-versus-PC dichotomy, Apple's focus on visual interface, exotic technologies like touch, and fun stuff (music, video, and games), coupled with its lack of "serious" capabilities such as encryption, let that perception take root as the conventional wisdom.

[ Dive deep into mobile 2.0 technology with InfoWorld's "mobile 2.0" PDF special report. | Check out the slide show "BlackBerry vs. iPhone, side by side." | Get the scoop on all tech mobile in Tom Yager's Mobile Edge blog. ]

I didn't grow up in my corporate life with either an iPhone or a BlackBerry. For me, a phone is something to make calls with, and a PDA handles my contacts and calendar. But a year ago, I replaced my nearly dead Handspring Palm-based PDA with an iPod Touch and quickly grasped the significance of the "modern" PDA -- the importance, from both a personal and a professional point of view, of having the Web, e-mail, and more at my fingertips. To me the iPod Touch, and by extension the iPhone, was about as productive as a PDA could be, yet I saw BlackBerrys everywhere in conferences and business meetings.

What was it about the BlackBerry that I was missing? Would the iPhone really fall short in a business setting?

To find out, I spent a month with an iPhone 3G and a BlackBerry 9000 Bold (the professional model that RIM recommended as the best to compare to an iPhone) to see how well each would fare in my daily grind. (For the answers to that, see my upcoming stories later this week on using the BlackBerry Bold and on using the iPhone 3G as laptop replacements at InfoWorld.com.) In doing so, I also had the chance to compare the two devices in depth: mail to mail, phone to phone, browser to browser, and thumb stroke to touch-tap. In short, I evaluated them based on everything from classic PDA functionality and usability to location-based services and availability of third-party apps.

And how do they stack up? Frankly, I've concluded it's time to bury the BlackBerry. A revolution in its time, thanks to its ability to provide instant, secure e-mail anywhere, the BlackBerry has become the Lotus Notes of the mobile world: It's way past its prime.

Close

On Twitter now

Smartphones

Powered by Twitter

On Twitter now

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

White Paper

An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings

Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »

White Paper

Bringing the Edge to the Data Center

Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.

Download now »
amacd 26-May-09 7:12am

The last five points outweigh the rest of the article by far in an enterprise setting. I agree the iPhone is excellent and outshines the current RIM offering in many ways but until central management and security are on par with BB devices, the iPhone will never take hold in the enteprise. The BB can't be buried, there is nothing to take it's place. As much as some would like it to be replaced with the iPhone, it's not feasible right now.

You used the age old Mac vs PC debate and how the iPhone was immediately pigeonholed in that light, unfortunately it holds true at least for now. How is the Mac doing in the enterprise...1%...maybe and for similar reasons you outlined.

Apple really isn't going after corporate, it doesn't need to right now. My three kids all want iPhones :)and when they get real jobs, their evil IT department will make them get BB devices.

Ha Inc 26-May-09 9:24am
1 reply
here you go: I can only assume that Galen Gruman of InfoWorld is trying to spark some feedback with his latest deathmatch pitting the iPhone against the BlackBerry Bold. He has been using an iPod Touch since he retired his Palm/Handspring so it is obvious where his point of view is coming from. I don’t have the time to debase every one of his arguments but some of them are so far off base that I cannot help but offer him some insight. Especially his conclusion of: Frankly, I’ve concluded it’s time to bury the BlackBerry. A revolution in its time, thanks to its ability to provide instant, secure e-mail anywhere, the BlackBerry has become the Lotus Notes of the mobile world: It’s way past its prime. 1. First Galen goes on a diatribe about how the iPhone’s email client is vastly superior to the BlackBerry email client. Need I go further? Truly it is just a matter of preference but I have used both and things like being able to attach files from a user accessible file system is just elementary. 2. Galen points out how the iPhone has all the normal email actions such as reply and forward with their own dedicated buttons. I guess he did not bother with keyboard shortcuts such as “R” for reply and “F” for forward… He also claims it is hard to delete messages on the BlackBerry but I guess he did not figure out that the delete button deletes messages. 3. Galen admits that the iPhone does not let you search for messages… but then uses that as a reason for why the iPhone client is better at selecting multiple messages. 4. He then goes on to say how when you add a contact the BlackBerry does not always catch the senders name and you have to enter it to save the contact. He claims the iPhone is better because it lets you save the email address and enter in the name later… That would just clutter your address book. 5. Galen is using the just launched and mediocre App World as a comparison to Apples app store. I admit that applications are limited on the BlackBerry and there are not a wealth of options but the apps that do exist are awesome. For example, Google Talk and all the IM clients… The iPhone cannot even run such applications together! 6. Galen then went on to compare Gokivo Navigator to Google Maps on the iPhone. Why did he not compare Google Maps on the BlackBerry? He claims that the iPhone locks onto GPS quicker because of cell phone triangulation but BlackBerry apps have the same function. Not to mention that the BlackBerry also has TeleNav GPS directions which is not possible on a iPhone. http://www.berryreview.com/2009/05/26/did-the-bold-just-lose-infoworlds-...
Galen Gruman 26-May-09 6:13pm
1 reply
For the record, you misquoted what I write about iPhone and search. Where I allegedly say the iPhone lets you search so you can group-select otherwise noncontiguous messages, I'm talking about the BlackBerry, showing how it can do something the iPhone can't. On the GPS issue, so why can't the BlackBerry Bold find my location when I'm indoors but the iPhone can? Both are on the same AT&T network (which both require). I of course don't think memorizing dozens of key commands for functions is intuitive or easy. Yes, you can make the BlackBerry do a lot if you want to treat it like a DOS or Unix PC and go through arcane commands, menu settings, and multiple menu modes. Who has the time? As for the other issues, I agree that these come down to what you're willing to accept. I just can't believe anyone who's used both would think the BlackBerry was more capable or more usable overall. It's not. Usability is why I chose a Mac over Vista, and a TiVo over the crappy DVR my cable company has. Why is usability considered to be "non-enterprise"? -- is the idea to torture users or keep dependent on IT help? Anyhow, everyone's comments appreciated, no matter where you stand.

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Mobilize Newsletter

Receive the latest news, reviews and discussions on everything mobile.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.