October 28, 2009

ARM vs. Atom: The battle for the next digital frontier

Small, inexpensive, power-efficient new chips from Intel and ARM are enabling the new wave of mobile devices -- and setting the two companies on a collision course

For once, Intel knows how it feels to be the underdog.

Over the past 25 years, Intel has risen to become the leading supplier of microprocessors for home and business computing, commanding a virtual monopoly in the market for desktop, laptop, and server CPUs. Even Apple has joined the choir.

But CEO Paul Otellini isn't content to stop there. He envisions a world in which Intel chips power every device, from the grandest server to the humblest media appliance -- a "continuum of computing" that spans many tiers of processor power, all united by Intel's x86 architecture.

[ Linux, Android, Atom, and ARM -- the coming netbook revolution could carve out a whole new niche in computing | Meanwhile huge performance gains in InfoWorld's Test Center review prove Intel's Nehalem owns quad-core ]

Key to this vision is Atom, the most recent entry in Intel's processor line. Compact and extremely energy-efficient, Atom is already the leading CPU for netbook computers. With its latest, ultra-low-voltage versions of the chip, Intel is poised to take x86 even further down Otellini's continuum, away from PCs and into the world of handsets, media players, smart TVs, and other digital electronic devices.

It won't be easy. Intel may be the reigning king of PCs and server CPUs, but in the world of mobile devices, that title goes to an unlikely rival: a small, unassuming company called ARM Holdings, based in Cambridge, England.

Most consumers have never even heard of ARM. You won't see ARM ad campaigns in magazines or on TV. There are no stickers proclaiming "ARM Inside!" The company employs fewer than 1,800 people, and at $3 billion, its market capitalization is a mere fraction of Intel's. But make no mistake -- ARM and Intel are on a collision course. What happens next could determine the shape of the computing industry for years to come.

The next digital frontier
The stakes are high in the market for electronic devices, but the opportunity is massive.

Consider: Intel sold its 1 billionth x86 chip in 2003. Its closest rival, AMD, broke the 500 million mark just this year. ARM, on the other hand, expects to ship 2.8 billion processors in 2009 alone -- or around 90 chips per second. That's in addition to the more than 10 billion ARM processors already powering devices today.

Pick up any mobile phone and there's a 95 percent chance it contains at least one ARM processor. If the phone was manufactured in the past five years, make that 100 percent; that goes for standard handsets as well as smartphones.

The same is true for portable media players. Whether the label says Archos, iRiver, or Sony, inside it's ARM.

You'll also find ARM chips in wireless routers from D-Link, Linksys, and Netgear; printers from HP, Konica Minolta, and Lexmark; graphing calculators from HP and TI; GPS devices from Blaupunkt, Garmin, and TomTom; and countless other devices. Even the flight information system on Burt Rutan's SpaceShipOne was powered by ARM.

Read more about hardware in InfoWorld's Hardware Channel.

Close

On Twitter now

Processors

Powered by Twitter

On Twitter now

additional resources
White Paper - How to Improve Delivery of Advanced Web Applications

White Paper

Virtual Workforce: The Key to Expanding The Business While Cutting Costs

Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.

Go inside:
The three-step approach to making a virtual workforce a reality.
The four flavors of client virtualization technologies.
The three key initiatives that solve IT challenges.
Download now »
White Paper: Successfully Secure Your Wireless LAN With Wi-Fi firewalls.

White Paper

Addressing Linux Threats Leveraging Fewer Resources

The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.

Download now »
White Paper - The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

White Paper

The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.

Download now »
White Paper - Is Your Backup System Outdated?

White Paper

Mid-range Storage Considerations

A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.

Download now »
nrlz 29-Oct-09 12:20am
An interesting article. Although Intel has begun licensing out it's designs for others to implement (just like ARM) they should be weary of piracy. If China can produce x86 chips that are crappy, but are much cheaper than Intel's, Intel would stand to lose much. Not such a problem for ARM where the quality per dollar ratio still makes China's chips inferior.
quadibloc 1-Nov-09 8:39am
For most embedded applications, x86 compatibility is almost irrelevant, even if it might make development easier in some ways. For netbooks, though, being able to run Windows software is almost a must-have. Unless Microsoft were to start selling Windows 3.1 (or maybe Windows 98?) again, if someone wanted to make a sub-netbook - a personal computer that has a handheld videogame or pocket calculator form factor and sub-$100 price tag - they would have to use some version of Linux, which means they might as well use an ARM chip. So Microsoft is the company with the key to making Intel's success in this area more rapid.
rldipaolo 28-Dec-09 12:45pm
x86 allows you to run standard Windows. Big Deal. Windows is on the ropes and on it's way out anyway. No embedded developer with half a brain would even consider Windows for an embedded application - Windows is NOT an instrumentation O/S, and it's horrible to develop device drivers for. When I can get a 32-bit Harvard Architecture ARM Cortex-M3 based processor for under $5 in quantity, and run Linux on it powered by a "coin" battery - AND when one can get tons of built-in devices like serial ports, USB, SD card interface, D/A, A/D, SPI, I2C, CAN, and much more; HOW could any thinking engineer ever choose an x86 family processor, even the Atom over an advanced ARM processor??? There is no competition. Intel and Microsoft are antiquated giants of a bygone era, and what we are seeing now-a-days are these 2 has-beens becoming more irrelevant by the day. And by the way, the embedded industry DOES NOT WANT nor need x86/Windows programmers. How stupid could one be to try to press "desktop" programmers into service trying to develop embedded applications? There is a vast gulf of knowledge between desktop and embedded programming. If I had to employ a Windows programmer in an embedded development position the first thing I would tell them would be "Forget everything you've learned about programming for Windows - you're going to need to learn again from scratch to be an effective embedded developer, that is after you've taken at least some basic electronics and digital logic classes".

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Technology: Hardware Newsletter

The one-stop resource center for IT professionals.

©1994-2010 Infoworld, Inc.