April 16, 2009

No good excuses not to power down PCs

IT admins cite plenty of obstacles to embracing PC power management, but all of them can be overcome

I can appreciate why companies don't pursue certain green-tech initiatives. A massive server virtualization and consolidation effort can be costly, complex, and time-consuming. Overhauling the datacenter to meet LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Gold standards and filling it with the newest, most energy-efficient IT and CRAC equipment isn't particularly practical. Similarly, replacing all your PCs and monitors with machines that meet EPEAT Gold standards -- meaning they're both energy efficient and built in an environmentally friendly manner -- might represent too costly and complicated an endeavor.

But there's one green tech initiative that I firmly believe every organization out there should embrace now: PC power management. Computers and monitors all over the world are left powered during non-working hours, wasting electricity. That directly affects the bottom line, as it means higher energy bills; it also means your organization has a larger carbon footprint. By loading machines with software and adjusting policies, organizations can curb that waste, thus saving money. It seems pretty straightforward. Why, then, don't more organizations do it?

[ Learn more about the basics of PC power management. ]

Recent survey results from Forrester provide some answers. The research company asked 83 IT professionals what the top barriers were to implementing PC power management.

The ROI question
Among the barriers, not surprisingly, was the question of cost and ROI. Some IT admins weren't convinced that the energy saved from putting PCs and monitors to sleep during off-hours would make up for the cost of PC power management software. In reality, though, the savings can, indeed, be quite compelling. All you need to do is crunch a few numbers.

Consider that keeping a computer on when it's not in use can cost between $25 and $75 per year in wasted electricity. (I've actually seen numbers higher than $75; it depends on numerous factors, including model of machine and monitor, energy costs, and hours left on.) We can average that out to $50. Now let's say PC power management software costs $33 per license for the first year and $10 per year afterward. (Those are the figures I've seen for a package from Autonomic Software.) In this scenario, if you have 1,000 PCs, you could save $17,000 the first year and $40,000 each year thereafter. The savings for the first year could be higher if your local utility offers incentives for employing PC power management.

[ Learn more about the ROI of PC power management. | Find out how to measure how much power your machines use. ]

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

Trial

Free 30-Day Desktop Virtualization Trial

Download a free 30–day trial and experience how XenDesktop delivers a pristine, on–demand desktop experience to users on whatever device they choose, while cutting IT complexity and costs.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »
mpswaim 16-Apr-09 5:59am

We run computationally intensive tasks on our PCs after they've been idle for 15 minutes using Condor. Duplicating the processing power of all of our desktops when they're idle with a dedicated cluster would be expensive.

blahblah 16-Apr-09 3:11pm
2 replies

Assuming the average PC takes 2 minutes to start up, times 250 work days a year. That means on average, you're going to lose 8 hours of work a year waiting for your PC to boot in the morning. Add time to load programs and you're making things much worse.

Hence, it's more profitable for the company to leave the machines on than to waste 2 minutes a day per employee.

pmdubuc 17-Apr-09 4:27am
The assumption that no productive work can be done during the 2 minutes a PC takes to start up needed to be examined. So does the assumption that productive work is being done during all 8 hours that a PC is up during the workday. What really makes that 2 minutes saved by leaving a PC on all night so valuable if these assumptions are not accurate?
godzilla808 17-Apr-09 8:30am
Peter Gibbons: Well, I generally come in at least fifteen minutes late, ah, I use the side door - that way Lumbergh can't see me, heh heh - and, uh, after that I just sorta space out for about an hour. Bob Porter: Da-uh? Space out? Peter Gibbons: Yeah, I just stare at my desk; but it looks like I'm working. I do that for probably another hour after lunch, too. I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work.
macfrosty 17-Apr-09 11:54am
This article, like many on the subject, is comparing the wrong numbers. The energy usage difference from leaving a machine full on as opposed to turning it off is large. But the comparison should be between energy use of a computer when it is asleep as opposed to it being turned off. Look at your computers specs and you will find the difference between the sleep state and the off state is often less than 2 watts. We crunched the number here for about 200 seats and the savings from turning machines off as opposed to just making sure they are put to sleep was less than $150 annually. You read that right. People who advocate for turning machines off aren't thinking it all the way through, or just have an axe to grind.

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Today's Headlines: First Look Newsletter

Find out what will be news for the day, with our first-thing-in-the-morning briefing.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.