October 06, 2009

Apple quits U.S. Chamber of Commerce over views on carbon regs

Bold move highlights struggle -- and potential synergy -- between business and environmental demands

Apple, which once suffered bruising allegations of having a poor environmental track record, continues to prove itself a model eco-steward among high-tech companies, most recently by quitting the U.S. Chamber of Commerce over the group's stance on global warming.

Apple's resignation comes shortly after the group called for a public hearing on the scientific evidence for man-made climate change, a response to a proposed EPA plan that would allow the agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Likely interpreting the Chamber's request as a stalling tactic, Apple sent a letter of resignation stating that it "supports regulating greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions" and that "it is frustrating to find the Chamber at odds with us in this effort."

[ Industry experts recommend that datacenter operators start preparing now for carbon regulations. | Companies aren't acting quickly enough to reduce carbon emissions, the Carbon Disclosure Project warns. ]

The company's move will certainly draw attention to the struggle between the business world and environmentalists over carbon regulations. Companies -- including those operating large datacenters -- are understandably leery of environmental laws curbing GHG emissions. They may have to invest resources in measuring, reporting, and reducing emissions. They may face a spike in energy costs. They may have to pour money into carbon-cutting measures, such as costly building and equipment upgrades. Moreover, companies fear that carbon regulations will give a competitive edge to business rivals based in countries that don't have similar laws.

At the same time, however, Apple's move draws more attention to its own environmental efforts -- and to the fact a company can flourish while going above and beyond the call of duty to protect the planet and human health. Contrary to past accusations from Greenpeace and investors that the company falls short on the green front, Apple is a leader among tech companies in the environmental realm.

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

White Paper

An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings

Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »

White Paper

Bringing the Edge to the Data Center

Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.

Download now »
DL 8-Oct-09 4:44am
Bravo to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for standing up for a public debate on the specious carbon regulation issues!
CodeZombie 8-Oct-09 8:34am
So let me get this straight. Apple doesn't like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce because someone there would actually have the nerve to question all this global warming nonsense? Sounds to me more like they want to try to shut down anyone who has a difference of opinion. Why am I not surprised? By the way, in their quest to save the planet I guess they are now using the new fluorescent pig-tail light bulbs. Those things are an eco-disaster waiting to happen. Uh, yeah, great idea folks. Yes, they save energy but they're full of mercury!
ddines 8-Oct-09 12:43pm
Why is it that the small minority of people who say global warming is a myth are regurgitating the nonsense being fed them by fringe corporate interests. If you will notice that even former skeptics in the scientific community when shown recent data are no longer skeptical. I am curious, have any of you guys actually read any studies. Where are your facts? How many have degrees in meteorology or climatology? How about even taken a class in meteorology college? How about a statistics course? As usual, the people who know the least, have the strongest opinion, mostly based on a sound bite they heard from an equally uninformed zealot. It would be like taking advice from your mechanic on how to invest your retirement funds. As for the mercury in CFLs. It is a known issue, and if you do the research you will find that it is still a very small amount in each bulb. Yes it is a risk, and that is why no one is talking about using CFLs as long term solution. LEDs and OLEDs are promising, but the costs need to come down. I use CFLs myself, I know the risk and stil use them. If you do not like the risk, then don't buy them. As for the US Chamber, they are an industry lobbying group, and their powerful members are trying to stall regulation. Apple did the right thing and I hope others follow suit.
DMc 13-Oct-09 6:38am
Bravo to Apple for concluding the US Chamber of Commerce’s environmental policy is not aligned with their core values and quitting the chamber. The issue between Apple and the Chamber is not a disagreement whether or not climate change is real but how to address the issue. Apple is for decisive action by the EPA and US legislation, the chamber is saying No to EPA regulations, despite Supreme Court’s decision that the EPA’s job is to regulate CO2, and the chamber also wants an international solution. Reading that the chamber wants an international solution is laughable. Since when does American business interest want to be told by anyone else how to do anything? To be fair, here is the chamber’s position on Energy on the Environment http://www.uschamber.com/issues/index/environment/five_positions.htm. What I find interesting is that the chamber is leveraging the voice of 80 year old Michigan Rep. John Dingle and quotes him and his view on the EPA. I’ll place my bet that Steve and the brain trust at Apple, PG&E, Nike, etc are more knowledgeable about climate change and high-technology than Dingle and the Chamber.

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Today's Headlines: First Look Newsletter

Find out what will be news for the day, with our first-thing-in-the-morning briefing.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.