February 21, 2003

When winning isn't everything

It's not total victory, but the ABA's snub forces UCITA proponents to push on alone

Forgive me if I come across as a bad winner this week. When it comes to Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA), I just haven’t had any practice.

In case you missed the news, on Feb. 10 at the American Bar Association’s house of delegates meeting in Seattle, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) withdrew its motion asking the ABA approve UCITA. What many of the news stories missed was that this withdrawal is permanent, meaning NCCUSL has virtually conceded UCITA will never be a uniform law enacted by all the states.

“It is apparent that there is a strongly held view among a number of sections and other delegates that this body should not take a position on the merits of UCITA,” NCCUSL President King Burnett told the ABA delegates in withdrawing the motion. “We have no intention of bringing this act back [to the ABA] in the future.”

Because the ABA's house of delegates as a whole could neither debate nor vote after the motion was withdrawn, NCCUSL subsequently tried to portray the withdrawal as less than a total defeat. In point of fact, though, the ABA conducted quite a number of debates and votes on UCITA. Five ABA sections — policy-making groups within the ABA that focus on a particular area of the law — examined UCITA in the weeks leading to the Seattle meeting and took a position. All recommended that their members vote to table UCITA indefinitely.

Perhaps the most important of these recommendations, in terms of UCITA's future, was that taken by the ABA business law section. "Generally, uniform acts illustrate an emerging consensus around certain areas of the law," the business law section council wrote when urging ABA delegates to vote to postpone indefinitely consideration of UCITA. "Clearly, there is no consensus here. … It is the strong preference and sentiment of the section leadership to refrain from an endorsement of this proposal and, instead, to support a motion to postpone. Please also be advised that if the motion to postpone is defeated, the business law section delegates have been instructed by the section's council to vote 'no' on the proposed resolution."

Many of the other sections that took a stance on UCITA followed the same formula, asking the delegates to vote to postpone if they could, and to vote to reject if they had to. In addition to the sections, several smaller standing committees also voiced their concerns. Perhaps the most telling of these — at least in terms of showing that ABA members clearly understood what they were dealing with — was a letter from the ABA's standing committee on law and national security explaining why the committee could not support the motion to approve UCITA. “We are unable to support this resolution because the ‘automatic restraint’ provision could allow for the installation of ‘backdoors’ and present a significant security concern, potentially affecting key aspects of our nation's critical infrastructure,” the security committee’s letter read in part.

Close

On Twitter now

Application development

Powered by Twitter
additional resources
White Paper - How to Improve Delivery of Advanced Web Applications

White Paper

Virtual Workforce: The Key to Expanding The Business While Cutting Costs

Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.

Go inside:
The three-step approach to making a virtual workforce a reality.
The four flavors of client virtualization technologies.
The three key initiatives that solve IT challenges.
Download now »
White Paper: Successfully Secure Your Wireless LAN With Wi-Fi firewalls.

White Paper

Addressing Linux Threats Leveraging Fewer Resources

The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.

Download now »
White Paper - The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

White Paper

The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.

Download now »
White Paper - Is Your Backup System Outdated?

White Paper

Mid-range Storage Considerations

A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.

Download now »

Developer World Newsletter

Receive a weekly roundup about the art and science of software development.

©1994-2010 Infoworld, Inc.