Red Hat on Thursday released a Linux software stack for compute-intensive IT environments that it said costs less than Microsoft's price for its comparable Windows offering.
Red Hat charges a subscription of $249 per node, or server, per year for Red Hat HPC Solution, a new offering that combines Red Hat Enterprise Linux with Platform Open Cluster Stack 5, clustering software it has licensed from Platform Computing.
[ Discover the top-rated IT products as rated by the InfoWorld Test Center. ]
Red Hat HPC Solution also includes device drivers, a cluster installer, cluster-management tools, a resource and application monitor, interconnect support, and a job scheduler. The yearly subscription also includes ongoing technical support, bug fixes, and any future software updates, said product marketing manager Gerry Riveros.
Comparably, Microsoft's Windows HPC Server 2008, which also combines the OS with components needed for clustering and managing the HPC environment, costs a one-time fee of $475 per node, which on the surface seems less expensive than Red Hat's offering.
However, to get maintenance and software updates, Microsoft requires that enterprise customers purchase an Enterprise Assurance (EA) maintenance agreement for three years. Though Microsoft will not disclose publicly what those agreements cost, those familiar with them said they typically cost about 25 to 29 percent of the price of the product.
Factoring in the cost of the EA, the cost of one Windows HPC 2008 Server over three years would be more than $800, while a comparable HPC offering from Red Hat is about $750.
Through its public relations firm, Microsoft on Thursday declined to provide estimates about how much Windows HPC Server 2008 will cost over three years for customers beyond the per-node pricing, saying that information will be available on its Web site on Nov. 1.
Customers who require HPC environments perform tasks such as data modeling or complex, computer-generated simulation that require complex computational power.
Before Thursday, Red Hat offered only a version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux for HPC environments; customers have to assemble other components of the software needed to build a full-scale HPC environment themselves, Riveros said.
He acknowledged that pressure from Microsoft in the HPC market inspired the company to sell an all-in-one offering for a competitive price. Customers, too, asked Red Hat to combine the components with the OS to make for easier deployment and management, he said.
"We wanted to remove the chief roadblocks, the whole hassle of trying to put it together themselves," Riveros said.
Linux is the OS most used for HPC environments and has been dominant in the market for some time. However, over the past several years, Microsoft -- a relative newcomer to the space -- has stepped up its efforts because the company wants people to use Windows in that market.
Last month, Microsoft released to manufacturing Windows HPC Server 2008 as a complete bundle for deploying and managing high-performance clusters at what it claims is a competitive price. Microsoft and Cray also last month unveiled a $25,000 personal supercomputer, the Cray CX1, that they said will give people an HPC environment at their desktop.
Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.
The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.
Download now »Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.
Download now »A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.
Download now »
