August 20, 2007

Processors: Dividing chips into many virtual cores

The era of the big, muscular CPU is on the decline. The real trend is toward slicing and dicing cores virtually, one for each thread

The current approach taken by x86 CPUs -- to stuff as many processor cores and as much cache memory as will fit on one chip -- will prove impossible to scale beyond a certain point. And adding more, big, hot processor cores may not be the best fit for server roles that call for managing large workloads over long periods of time.

Over the next several years, I believe that AMD, IBM, Intel, and Sun will gather around an objective epitomized by Sun's UltraSPARC T2 (Niagara 2) CPU: an approach to maximizing throughput that Sun refers to as CMT (Chip Multi Threading).

The x86 world has seen the likes of chip multi-threading on a smaller scale with Intel's Pentium 4 (Netburst) architecture. Intel's Hyper Threading split one physical CPU into two logical processors, but it was implemented on a complex and unwieldy processor architecture.

Intel shelved Hyper Threading when it scrapped Netburst in favor of Core microarchitecture, but Intel's move to a simpler CPU core paves the way for Hyper Threading's return. To actually implement multiple threads, however, Intel may have to forego its obsession with equipping each new generation of CPU with more cores, bigger caches, and faster clock speeds.

It could take years, but Intel and AMD will go wide on threading. All CPU makers will, because unlike a processor core, which has to be wired into cache, memory, and I/O, hardware threading splits the gross resources provided by cores in a way that suits virtualization particularly well. And unlike virtualization extensions, which require that system software be aware of the means by which the CPU supports multiple virtual partitions, chip multi-threading doesn't require anything other than whatever is already programmed into OSes and virtualization solutions to deal with multiple discrete processors.

In the end, the biggest gains in server throughput will come from taking more of that work away from software.

Show me the list of other next big things | Surprise me with another next big thing

Tom Yager writes InfoWorld's Mobile Edge blog.
Close

On Twitter now

Application development

Powered by Twitter

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

White Paper

An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings

Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »

White Paper

Bringing the Edge to the Data Center

Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.

Download now »

Subscribe to the Developer World Newsletter

Receive a weekly roundup about the art and science of software development.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.