Riding a tide of desktop domination, Microsoft's latest foray into presence is expected to kick-start corporate adoption of IM. Lateness to market, however, has analysts skeptical as to how the offering will compete against those of longtime collaboration players such as IBM.
Office Live Communications Server 2003 -- code-named Greenwich and previously known as Real Time Communications Server -- was released to manufacturing last week. Microsoft sees the product's delivery, slated for six to eight weeks, as a "key moment" in establishing IM as a business tool, said Ed Simnett, lead product manager at Microsoft.
With Live Communications Server, companies will be able to run their own enterprise IM network, address security concerns related to public services, and log and manage employees' IM usage. The product is capable of determining whether a user is online and available for communication in Office applications and can extend this "presence" information to other applications such as custom portals.
Despite noting the significance of the product's upcoming release, analysts believe Microsoft has some catching up to do. Market incumbent IBM has been selling Lotus Sametime -- recently renamed Lotus Instant Messaging and Conferencing -- for approximately five years.
"Sametime has been out for a number of years, giving IBM a significant leg up. I would expect to see the second version of Office Live Communications Server as a closer competitor to Sametime," said Michael Osterman, president and founder of Osterman Research.
But with Office on nearly every business user's PC, Microsoft has a considerable market advantage, said Maurene Caplan Grey, research director at Gartner.
"What Live Communications Server has that nobody else has ... is integration with Office and SharePoint," Caplan Grey said. SharePoint is Microsoft's file-sharing and team-collaboration product.
New York-based law firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges has 3,000 people in nine countries already using IM. The firm rolled out Sametime in 2001 and uses the IM and presence features in several custom applications, said Richard Lowe, associate director of client information services at the firm.
"We have integrated IM into our portal, our own applications, and other systems such as ERP software; so rather that just having IM conversations happening, they can happen in context," Lowe said.
Providing IM in context is one of Microsoft's goals. Until now, Microsoft has struggled in finding a home for its IM product, placing it first in Exchange and then toying with making it part of Windows. The company finally settled on Office as the right place.
"The Exchange IM product was not really ready for prime time. Live Communications Server is a much more fully baked idea and part of a long-term road map for their collaboration products," said Robert Mahowald, research manager at Framingham, Mass.-based IDC.
Still, IBM's product has "four distinct advantages" over Microsoft's, according to Mahowald. Sametime has a lower overall price, includes Web conferencing, has no need for an additional server, and offers modular configuration, Mahowald said.
Francis deSouza, formerly Exchange IM product manager at Microsoft and now CEO of IMlogic, which sells software that overlays security and auditing tools on public IM systems, said Microsoft has had to go through "learning stages."
Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.
The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.
Download now »
Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.
Download now »
A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.
Download now »
Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts
Recommend This
