Ten years ago, I was the IT manager at a successful software company whose main product was aimed at large insurance companies. It was a DOS app that read records from large data files, did a little processing, and passed the results to other apps downstream. It wasn’t particularly pretty, but it was accurate -- and it was fast! It worked in batch mode, processing thousands of records per minute, which was a critical feature, considering how many records our clients needed to manage each day.
We were doing well with this app, which was pretty much the industry leader. So in a classic it-ain’t-broke-so-let’s-fix-it-anyway move, some of our managers and salespeople began complaining that it wasn’t written for Windows. They lamented the fact that we didn’t have a nice Windows GUI we could put on our sales brochures. If we didn’t rewrite for Windows, they insisted, our competitors would eat our lunch! And while they had our attention, these same people decided that the product would be even more appealing to our customers if it worked interactively, so users could process a single record at a time.
This seemed an odd request, because as far as I could remember, not one of our customers had ever tried to use the product in this manner. Come to think of it, our customers had never shown much interest in a Windows version either. I expressed my concern, but the boss was convinced that a Windows version of the software would be our ticket to world leadership.
Most of our in-house programmers had been laid off by this point, so the boss hired an expensive set of consulting software developers. In spite of my stated reservations, I was put in charge of managing these guys -- requirements, test plans, testing, daily builds, and so on.
When I costed out the notion of rewriting the application from scratch, the boss decided it would be way too time-consuming and expensive. The developers suggested creating a Windows front-end that would manipulate the old, reliable DOS application in the background. I considered this approach to be a serious kludge. Worse yet, it made the app a lot slower. And it was almost impossible to run it in high-speed batch mode. But it worked, and it was cheap. My boss loved it.
We worked on the code for six months; then the copywriters showed up. In order to create compelling sales materials, they insisted, we had to redesign the menus so they’d look good in the brochure. We were already over budget and over time, and some changes made the app harder to use. Still, the boss insisted.
We had worked closely with sales and upper management, and they loved the “new” Windows version. Unfortunately, we hadn’t shown it to any of our users. Apparently I was the only person in the company who was feeling nervous about this. Finally we prepared to take the app, the new brochures, and a large sales team to the biggest insurance convention of the year.
Proudly, we demonstrated our new baby to some of our largest customers. They liked the interface, they loved the brochures, but they all had the same two questions: “How can we get this to run faster?” and “How do we turn on batch mode?”
Our sales staff had no answers. But I had one: “Keep running the old version.” Of course, I didn’t think saying it out loud be a wise career move. So I kept it to myself.
Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.
The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.
Download now »Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.
Download now »A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.
Download now »
Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts
