A trend dubbed “legacy evolution” offers hope if you work at one of the estimated 10,000 major organizations still using a hierarchical or flat file database running Cobol applications. Or, for that matter, if your company continues to run a 1990s client/server application on a mini or Windows-based system.
As with any legacy, old systems retain intrinsic value that you don’t want to lose, even though they may be functionally obsolete.
Typically, the workflows and business logic built into legacy apps are timeless, even if the legacy hardware and software need modernizing. That’s why the emphasis is on “evolution,” not “legacy.” Whether you want to transition from IBM VSAM to DB2 or simply put a Web front end on a Sybase PowerBuilder client/server application, you can’t merely throw away the old stuff because the workflows and business processes hold core business value. What you really want is to enhance the current system, make it easier to maintain, and possibly integrate it with additional processes.
Providers of legacy evolution products are many, but BluePhoenix Solutions and Seagull Software are among the more interesting.
BluePhoenix focuses most of its attention on transitioning from flat file databases and the thousands of applications that run on them to relational databases, whereas Seagull targets companies with client/server applications that want to upgrade to componentized apps in an SOA.
The Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA), for example, was an IBM VSAM mainframe running about 600,000 lines of Cobol code. “We have 50,000 man-hours in, and we did not want to lose that legacy,” CTO Robert Whitten tells me.
LACERA uses BluePhoenix’s automated toolset to convert legacy apps and to compare programs. Automating the conversion instead of manually recoding provides the added benefit of consistency.
The rewritten programs, still in Cobol, are easier to maintain, enhance, and integrate, according to Arik Kilman, CEO at BluePhoenix Solutions.
Another BluePhoenix customer, Lawson Products, is making a transition from an IBM VSE mainframe system using an IDMS flat file database over to DB2 on an MVS IBM mainframe. The company will be converting approximately 2,000 programs.
This conversion will give Lawson the ability to perform database field expansion — and position the company for future growth toward an SOA development environment, according to Karen Larson, senior director of applications at Lawson.
Seagull has a different approach. It is, as Seagull CIO Andre den Haan says, noninvasive, where a Web services layer wraps around existing applications and components, enabling customers to create composite applications out of legacy systems without altering legacy code.
“With Sarbanes-Oxley, many customers need to do additional processes. You can’t just enter a PO as you do in a legacy system. There needs to be a business process in front of that for compliance,” den Haan says.
BluePhoenix’s Kilman says 90 percent of the companies that are using aging systems could be forced off them within the next five years. If they don’t evolve those systems, “they will disappear. It is that simple,” Kilman tells me.
Words to live by, if you ask me.
Read more about software development in InfoWorld's Developer World Channel.
Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.
The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.
Download now »
Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.
Download now »
A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.
Download now »
Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts
Recommend This
