September 04, 2006

The end of VC?

Kieden founder says SaaS made VC unnecessary

For anyone who doesn’t play close attention to developments in the SaaS (software as a service) space, the story of San Francisco startup Kieden might sound like a replay of one of those “spin straw into gold” tales from the height of the dot-com bubble. But Salesforce.com’s Aug. 21 announcement that it acquired six month-old Kieden and its technology for tracking Google AdWord campaigns was no act of drunken optimism. Kieden’s success, like that of Salesforce, is evidence of a new and powerful wave that’s just starting to break in the IT sector, as SaaS vendors create an environment in which countless smaller companies can quickly and effortlessly be born, grow, and thrive. Kieden founder Kraig Swensrud, now senior director of product marketing at Salesforce.com, spoke with InfoWorld Senior Editor Paul F. Roberts about SaaS, Web 2.0, agile development and how the rules are changing for startups of all stripes. 

InfoWorld: You were self-funded and didn’t take in any venture capital. Had Salesforce.com not come along as it did, would that have continued indefinitely?

Kraig Swensrud: I believe it is possible for a small company to get up and running and reach a level of revenue generation where venture capital is not necessarily needed. The benefit to startup companies like Kieden these days is that there are so many services on the Web that can be subscribed to for a monthly fee as opposed to shelling out up-front cash to acquire a bunch of systems to run a small business. We attempted to use as many Internet-based services as possible. We ended up doing our hosting and e-mail through Yahoo small business. We ran our CRM system on Salesforce.com and used a service from Jotspot.com for document sharing and collaboration.

Now nobody knew that. If you went to Kieden.com or if I sent you an e-mail, you wouldn’t know it was coming from Yahoo’s servers -- but it was, and at a total cost of $14.95 a month. We only have few people in the company, so Salesforce was a couple hundred dollars a month, which was amazingly cheap compared to the alternative. Through Jotspot we had this amazing collaborative space on the Internet where we could share files and documents and communicate and that could be accessed from any computer or BlackBerry anywhere in the world.

The fact that we were able to move so quickly was in large part because of a methodology we used internally called agile development. The idea is that you develop in very fast iterative cycles. The goal in each phase, in our case they were one week cycles, is to assemble as much feedback from the customer base as possible about what’s working and what’s not and quickly iterate on the product and release new versions of the product as quickly as possible.

IW: Were you surprised with the speed with which you got noticed and consumed by Salesforce?

KS: No, I was not surprised by the speed with which we got noticed. I’m certain that was simply [a result of] the idea we had. Within Salesforce, when you make the claim that you can mash up Salesforce’s business processes with Google’s advertising system, which is the same system that is generating 99.9 percent of the company’s revenue, it’s not surprising that everyone stands up and takes notice.

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Developer World Newsletter

The one-stop resource center for IT professionals.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.