Does Microsoft deliver?
Office 2003 opens XML floodgates to the Windows masses, but InfoPath ships only with top tier and Macs get left out
Follow @infoworldAt the beginning of April, I attended the fourth annual InfoWorld CTO Forum in
A new product in the Office suite, InfoPath (formerly XDocs) promises to make it easy for regular users to build forms to capture information in simple XML templates, requiring no knowledge of XML on the user's part. For the first time, I'm actually excited about a new release of Office: This approaches the holy grail of XML-enabled desktop applications. A large percentage of work produced in any business is document-based, and I can envision at least a dozen applications at InfoWorld in all areas of the company that could be streamlined in this new Office environment. In that sense, the release of Office 2003 is indeed revolutionary. As jazzed as I am, though, I have some trepidation about the new release.
First, Microsoft will be releasing six different bundles of Office, and InfoPath will only be included in the top-tier Enterprise Edition. The Professional Edition, just one step below
Not only does InfoPath promise to simplify business processes that are dependent on documents, but it can ease an IT shop's development burden by replacing some Web-based front ends with something simpler and easier for users to develop and administer. As nonpower-users build forms somewhat spontaneously in InfoPath, developers can focus on building the back-end glue and making the business processes work. But only if they have the Enterprise Edition.
I can hear CFOs everywhere saying, "Do you really need this InfoPath thing, or can we save the money and get Professional Edition?" As compelling as this new release is, every nickel and dime still counts in most businesses. In fact, I spoke to the CTO of a large company who is piloting StarOffice as a complete replacement for Microsoft Office, which, across thousands of desktops, could save the company millions of dollars.









