Oracle has agreed to acquire business applications vendor Siebel Systems in a deal valued at approximately $5.85 billion, or a net value of $3.61 billion taking into account Siebel's cash reserves, the companies announced Monday.
The deal marks Oracle's latest step in its bid to remake itself as a global business applications powerhouse, following the closure of its $10.3 billion acquisition of PeopleSoft at the start of the year.
Oracle plans to support the existing suite of Siebel products for "some time to come," said Larry Ellison, Oracle's chief executive officer, during a conference call to discuss the deal. Oracle had been planning to include a CRM (customer relationship management) suite as part of Fusion, the company's vision for a next-generation suite of products. "Because Siebel is the leader and understands the category, it makes us building the Fusion CRM function easier and less risky," he said.
Siebel's OnDemand offering, a hosted CRM solution, was a key reason that Oracle was interested in making the acquisition. "We think that's a very important asset and we want to preserve and invest in it," said Ellison. He expects that all features and functions in Siebel software will migrate to the OnDemand offerings.
In contrast to its hostile PeopleSoft takeover, Siebel's management is behind the deal. Chairman Thomas Siebel, along with the rest of the Siebel board, have agreed to vote in favor of the deal, Oracle said in a statement. Siebel's stockholders will hold a special meeting to decide whether to approve the deal. Oracle does not need the approval of its own stockholders to go ahead with the takeover, it said.
"It's just clear as day that this is in the best interest of our partners, customers, shareholders and employees," said Tom Siebel, chairman of Siebel Systems.
Ellison vaguely said that Siebel has agreed to continue to work with Oracle for some number of years. He didn't elaborate on how long or in what capacity.
Oracle executives expect that closing this deal and integrating Siebel into Oracle will be far simpler than the PeopleSoft acquisition. "This is drastically easier than PeopleSoft," Ellison said. That's because Siebel supports the deal and because Oracle now has the experience to digest a major acquisition. Also, PeopleSoft had just bought J.D. Edwards prior to Oracle buying PeopleSoft, adding complexity to that deal, Ellison said. "Siebel is a much less risky transaction and we're more experienced in doing integration," he said.
Observers agree. "The Oracle/Siebel integration will be much smoother than the Oracle/PeopleSoft integration. They're much more complementary," said Rebecca Wettemann, vice president, research with analyst Nucleus Research.
Oracle executives said the acquisition would create duplicate functions, especially because both companies have CRM research and development teams. Oracle expects to choose the best personnel from the teams but did not comment on how many workers might be laid off as a result of the acquisition.
In January of this year, Oracle announced it would lay off 5,000 people as a result of the PeopleSoft acquisition.
Oracle and Siebel expect the deal to close early next year, subject to regulatory approvals. Oracle was forced to battle the U.S. Department of Justice over its PeopleSoft merger, due to complaints that the deal would be anticompetitive.
Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.
The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.
Download now »
Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.
Download now »
A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.
Download now »
Sign up to receive Data Management Resource Alerts
1 Recommendation
