SANTA CLARA, Calif. – Former BEA Systems executive Adam Bosworth on Thursday criticized what he called the control of Web services standards development by companies such as IBM and Microsoft, who collaborated with BEA on these standards during Bosworth’s tenure.
Control of the standards by the large vendors has prevented Web services from enabling a Web that is far more able to mine, filter, and transform data than what is happening now, according to Bosworth, who is now a vice president at Google. He made his comments while serving as a keynote speaker at the MySQL Users Conference 2005 show.
Vendors such as IBM and Microsoft, in proposing the standards, were big, institutionalized companies trying to protect themselves, Bosworth said. “They were deliberately, in my opinion, making something hard,” he said, citing specifications such as Web Services ReliableMessaging.
Interviewed following his presentation, Bosworth acknowledged BEA’s participation with IBM and Microsoft in Web services specifications development and standardization while he was still a BEA employee.
“Yes, it was very frustrating,” Bosworth said. He left the company last year and had served as chief architect and senior vice president of Advanced Development.
“Well, I was doing my best to try to make [Web services] easier and simpler and some of it got easier and some of it got simpler,” Bosworth said. “There’s some good work that came out of those guys working together. The Web Services Addressing [WS-Addressing] stuff is easier and simpler than some of the stuff that preceded it. But it’s still hard.”
In addition to WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-Addressing, the three vendors have participated in development of Web services specifications such as WS-Eventing, BPEL (Business Process Execution Language for Web Services), WS-Transaction, and WS-Coordination.
Officials at IBM and Microsoft could not be reached for comment on Thursday.
During his presentation and afterward, Bosworth laid out his vision for a Web that is more focused on organizing data than just searching for content. “We need something that makes it easy to scale massively and linearly across the entire Web,” Bosworth said.
“We’re searching lots of stuff but we search it as content. We don’t search it as data,” Bosworth said. Users need to be able to access more than just keywords, he added.
Bosworth emphasized the promise of RSS (Really Simple Syndication) and Atom data syndication technologies for finding data. He also endorsed the concept of tagging. “Tags are sloppy and informal but it works better than anything else out there,” Bosworth said.
If users such as MySQL database experts had a source of information where they could take all the world’s data on the Web and start running their own UI and queries, they would be able to do things that Google could never imagine, Bosworth said.
Technologies such as XML Query and the Semantic Web, like Web services, have not fulfilled the data-searching vision, he said. XML Query took too long to create and it did not resemble the Web. The Semantic Web’s reliance on ontologies is problematic, according to Bosworth. “I don’t understand top-down ontologies,” which require that everyone agrees on a schema, he said.
“RDF actually has failed,” Bosworth said. RDF (Resource Description Framework) is a technology for processing metadata on the Semantic Web.
Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.
The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.
Download now »Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.
Download now »A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.
Download now »
Sign up to receive Architecture Resource Alerts
