CRM software on a smaller scale
ACCPAC and Maximizer offer solid but unspectacular CRM
ACCPAC offered good features for marketing, too. It would be nice if the program provided the same graphical views into the time lines and status of marketing campaigns as it does into sales leads and opportunities, but here you get just text-based links. Nevertheless, the result is a clear presentation of the marketing game plan, good definition of employee responsibilities, and the ability to mine responses for constructive feedback.
I was able to quickly build mail merges and lists, associate data with revenue projections, and, using ACCPAC’s e-mail management server, route inbound responses so new, targeted leads could be generated.
On the help-desk front, both ACCPAC and Maximizer allowed me to easily enter trouble tickets, assign new responsibilities, escalate service issues, and browse (but not search) the repository of customer service documents for resolutions to problems. Maximizer also includes a self-service portal through which customers with permissions may obtain documentation and search your knowledge base. By contrast, ACCPAC provides this feature at extra cost.
The most impressive feature of today’s CRM applications is automated workflow, which elevates CRM tools from static contact managers to a means of strengthening and streamlining sales and service processes. Whether built on simple triggers, such as an incoming e-mail from an important client, or on complex business logic and successful sales models, workflow engines help you monitor events and take prescribed action.
ACCPAC does a good job of integrating workflow into its system. I liked its ability to dynamically modify each user’s interface with actions that take them to the next step in a given process. For example, the promotion of a new lead to qualified opportunity status could trigger a reassignment of responsibilities, launch meeting reservations, and more.
Maximizer addresses workflow requirements with a third-party toolset, Vineyardsoft’s KnowledgeSync, which supplies a separate IDE for developing the SQL logic necessary to drive automation. KnowledgeSync came with a good base of predeveloped workflow procedures that jumpstart development -- a feature missing from ACCPAC.
In both products, I felt better attention needed to be paid to the workflow development interface, given the often-limited IT resources of the target market. In both, workflows are too difficult to set up and modify.
When it came to customization and security, ACCPAC provided, hands down, one of the most flexible interfaces I’ve encountered. Offering more than just role-based access, ACCPAC allowed me to completely tailor a user’s views based on permissions, rather than simply lock them out of an option, as in Maximizer.
When it comes to integrating CRM with your other IT systems, both of these vendors have you covered. However, integration may come at a high price.
To tap legacy databases from Maximizer, you’ll need to invest in a separate Customization Suite for XML and COM connectivity. ACCPAC requires the purchase of its Enterprise Integration Server to connect with data from non-ACCPAC applications.
Room for Improvement
ACCPAC and Maximizer offer solid CRM toolsets for smaller organizations. Both could improve by adding repository search capabilities, stronger project management time lines, and support for contract management.
Nevertheless, both provide essential wide-angle views across operations and the capability to automate workflows. ACCPAC offers broader database support, a more polished GUI, and a suite of easily integrated accounting and ERP apps. Maximizer offers more immediate scalability, thanks to replicable data stores, and the ability to leverage .Net and Web services for customization and integration.
Read more about applications in InfoWorld's Applications Channel.