June 16, 2009

When the IT budget is tight, good enough has to be enough

When IT resources are scarce and work needs to get done, stop sneering at easy-to-use end-user tools and start putting them to use

Dear Bob ...

Like just about everyone else, our IT budget has been shot to pieces. That's OK -- I've had to lay people off before and I've had to kill promising projects before. These things happen.

[ Bob Lewis has more IT management suggestion: "When does running IT as a business make sense?" | Get sage advice on IT careers and management from Bob Lewis in InfoWorld's Advice Line newsletter. ]

What I'm not used to is a team of executives (and I use the term "team" pretty loosely -- these people have no sense of teamwork at all), each of whom act as if my budget was just doubled. I'm serious. Every one of them is on my back to take care of his or her crash-and-burn project faster than we could have done it fully staffed.

I've tried explaining the facts of life, over and over again, and what I get in response is, "A high-school kid could put this together for me in Excel in a couple of days. Why are you telling me it needs seven people for six months?"

Any thoughts on how to bring a dose of reality into the discussion?

- Overwhelmed


Dear Overwhelmed ...

First, make a list. Sit down with each exec and ask them if they could get only one project done, what it would be. The rule for the discussion: They describe their projects in terms of business change, not in terms of software requirements ("We need to improve productivity in the warehouse by picking items more efficiently," not "We need an inventory picking system enhancement.")

Next, call a meeting with your business analysts. Walk them through the full list, then parcel out the requests based on each analyst's expertise and ability to get along with the various execs. In this discussion, let them know you're looking for quick solutions that are good enough, not elegant solutions that will withstand the test of time. Their job is to figure out how to get each exec most of the improvement they're looking for and quickly, not all of the improvements they'd like done the "right way."

This means that if a twice-a-day batch extract into Microsoft Access is good enough, there's no need to create a real-time SOA-driven interface. It means that a once-a-night dump-and-load into Excel might be a better answer than enhancing the data warehouse and its business intelligence interface.

It might mean nothing more than teaching their staff how to assign tasks to each other using plain-vanilla Microsoft Outlook, instead of deploying a full-blown, enterprise-scale integrated project management solution.

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

White Paper

An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings

Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »

White Paper

Bringing the Edge to the Data Center

Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.

Download now »
Drew Kime 17-Jun-09 9:20am
1 reply
I wrote up a hypothetical case study a while back, doing exactly this. I was comparing the costs of an automated system vs. the quick-and-dirty Access database solution. In my example, the automated system cost ~$500k in the first year, breaking even at 17 months after the project kickoff, assuming everything goes to plan. In the Access example, total cost was $72k, breaking even early in month 9 after kickoff. Per-month savings came out $50k/month higher with the automated system, meaning it's well into year 3 before the automated system saves money compared to the quick-and-dirty. Obviously the numbers are made up to make a point, but I think the underlying question -- why don't we want the simpler solution? -- isn't asked nearly often enough.
ostwaldl 17-Jun-09 12:16pm
Thats an easy one - its called "job security". Those extra costs are labor costs...right? And the job requirements to do the quick and dirty generally aren't what they are to do the dynamic and automated.
chuchundra 21-Jun-09 11:08am
Are you kidding? Job security? Creating a kludgey amalgam of Excel spreadsheets, VB Script, spaghetti code, spit and bailing wire to run important business functions is the definition of job security, as in, "We can't get rid of Bob, he's the only one who knows how this frakkin' thing works."

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Lewis: Advice Line Newsletter

The one-stop resource center for IT professionals.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.