June 02, 2009

Signs of progress on how employers view employees

Enlightened employers always understood that excellent employees are what make them, in turn, excellent

I know I'm going to regret this.

Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc., a well-known outplacement consultancy, recently distributed a press release reporting the results of a survey of HR executives they conducted.

[ See also: Every cost-cutting decision has a consequence -- even the easy ones | Get sage advice on IT careers and management from Bob Lewis in InfoWorld's Advice Line blog and newsletter. ]

The results were interesting enough that I'm making an exception to my policy of ignoring any and all press releases that come my way.

First, a complaint: As is the custom with companies publishing surveys, Challenger neglects to mention the sample size -- a defect that by itself would usually lead to me to assume a sample size of 12 and to my tossing the results in the trash.

Since the press release reported that one response was given by 52.4 percent of respondents, though, simple math tells me at least 262 individuals responded to the survey. That's enough to be worthy of attention.

Here's the good news: While companies certainly have laid off huge numbers of employees since the economy first started to implode, it appears many of them are doing everything they can to minimize the number. From the press release:

... employers announcing job cuts have initiated more cost-cutting measures than employers that have not cut payrolls. Companies that made permanent job cuts averaged an additional six cost-cutting measures. Meanwhile, companies that have avoided layoffs averaged less than three cost-cutting measures.

"There is a perception out there that some companies have not made sufficient efforts to avoid layoffs by making cutbacks in other areas. This perception is fueled, in part, by a handful of examples of companies announcing job cuts while, at the same time, rewarding top executives with large salaries, bonuses and extravagant perks. However, these examples represent the exception," said Challenger (John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray & Christmas).

"It would also be a mistake to assume that companies avoiding layoffs are doing so out of kindness. While forging good will is certainly part of the decision for some companies, many have simply cut to the bone already or never fully ramped up after the last downturn. Other companies may have more workers than they need for current business levels but are reluctant to enact widespread layoffs, knowing that a recovery will mean recruiting and training all new workers.

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

White Paper

An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings

Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »

White Paper

Bringing the Edge to the Data Center

Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.

Download now »
Hambone 2-Jun-09 8:31am
To get 52.4%, wouldn't that be the same response from 262 people out a total poll of 500 respondents? In other words, 262 = 0.524(500). If that's the case, the smallest integers that fit the equation would be 131 = 0.542(250), indicating the same response from 131 out of 250 respondents.
dougcrossfire 2-Jun-09 11:27am
"Simple math" is good, but oversimple math...notsomuch. Heck, you can get 52.4 percent from 43/82. Still, you have nothing on Ephraim Schwartz, who gave us this remarkable scoop on 10/11/05: "Burlington Coat Factory has saved anywhere from 300 percent to 500 percent by using StarOffice instead of Microsoft Office..."
aabaire 3-Jun-09 12:53pm
Many years ago I was taking a graduate level research course. The professor presented to the class a research report from a refereed journal that reported statistics to four significant figures. The sample size was less than 100. When I questioned the professor about this, he told me that reporting more significant figures made the results more scientific. It's amazing that mathematical artifacts allow us to measure differences of 1/100th of a person. I suppose five significant figures would have been even more scientific. 52.4% assures us of how large a sample size? Hah!
JeffreyFHarper 3-Jun-09 2:38pm
1 reply
Simple math indicates that the sample size need not be any larger than 21, since 11 out of 21 is (approximately) 52.3809524% which could be reported almost accurately (albeit with too much precision) as 52.4%.
Bob Lewis 3-Jun-09 2:50pm
At one time I had some confidence in my ability to perform simple math. I think I'll give up on it now, and instead report solely on matters of aesthetics. - Bob

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Lewis: Advice Line Newsletter

The one-stop resource center for IT professionals.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.