April 15, 2009

Amazon: A is for arrogant

The world's biggest e-tailer got itself in hot water thanks to a 'ham-fisted cataloging error.' But Amazon's real problem is its attitude -- and for that there's no easy fix.

Amazon found itself crucified this Easter, and though it has since climbed down from the cross, it hasn't quite managed to claw the nails out of its hands and feet.

The story, in case you missed it: Sometime around Egg and Bunny day, Amazon mysteriously started removing the sales rankings of many gay and lesbian book titles, making them virtually invisible to the store's search engine -- effectively shoving them into the closet.

[ Got amazing IT tales, real-life experiences, lessons learned the hard way, or war stories from the trenches? Submit it to InfoWorld's Off the Record blog. If we publish your story, we'll send you a $50 American Express gift card.]

Authors of those books (who obsess over things like their Amazon sales rank) began wondering what the hell happened. Word hit the Twittersphere and, well, excrement meet fan. The tag #amazonfail became the meme for the weekend.

The more bloggers looked into it, the worse it seemed. Titles like "Heather Has Two Mommies" got deranked, but not "The Parents' Guide to Preventing Homosexuality." Gay erotica and sexually themed memoirs were nixed, but not Playboy collections or the memoirs of hetero porn star Ron Jeremy.

Was Amazon pulling its own version of Proposition 8, quietly trying to ban unions between gay authors and their readers? You can imagine the turdstorm that followed on that line of thinking. Amazon's initial response -- it's a "glitch," we're looking into it -- did nothing to mollify the seething anger.

It took a day or so to get something resembling an explanation (and an apology) out of Amazon for what had happened, and even that was pretty darned vague:

This is an embarrassing and ham-fisted cataloging error for a company that prides itself on offering complete selection.

 

additional resources
White Paper - How to Improve Delivery of Advanced Web Applications

White Paper

Virtual Workforce: The Key to Expanding The Business While Cutting Costs

Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.

Go inside:
The three-step approach to making a virtual workforce a reality.
The four flavors of client virtualization technologies.
The three key initiatives that solve IT challenges.
Download now »
White Paper: Successfully Secure Your Wireless LAN With Wi-Fi firewalls.

White Paper

Addressing Linux Threats Leveraging Fewer Resources

The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.

Download now »
White Paper - The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

White Paper

The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.

Download now »
White Paper - Is Your Backup System Outdated?

White Paper

Mid-range Storage Considerations

A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.

Download now »
abletts 15-Apr-09 10:55pm
What's the problem? They messed up; they sorted it out. Surely it would be more of an issue if they'd refused to acknowledge that a problem existed in the first place (or if they refused to fix it).
Sean McCown 16-Apr-09 5:19am
I get the Dogma Free America podcast and they had a story sometime last year about Amazon. This was the same kind of crap in that there they were deleting all negative reviews of dianetics and other scientology books. This actally went on for an extended period before they felt the pressure to put the reviews back. But Amazone clearly feels the need to save the world somehow and they need to shut up and just do business. Because I'm sure B&N would be glad to fill their shoes on the web and sell all the gay books they can.
Phansigar 16-Apr-09 5:26am
1 reply
What's the problem? A. Despite Amazon's disclaimer that is was a mistake, merely a "miscategorizing," the result was too suspiciously homophobic to be merely a simple error. B. It was apparently too easy to begin with. C. It took a howl of protest to get Amazon to correct the problem. D. Any damage that was done to the books' sales probably can't be undone. E. It smacks of the Arab mentality: kill gays and lesbians (& not just in Iran), and censor/persecute anything that even faintly resembles "deviance." Is that enough?
abletts 17-Apr-09 12:45am
1 reply

Perhaps I am being naive here but surely, if they were homophobic, the natural response would have been for them to stop selling such material full-stop. It could be that they did have a plan to censor things but I have to say that I am sceptical. I can't help but wonder whether we are these days, so tuned up to take offence, to see a slight in another's actions, that there is no room for anyone to make a genuine mistake. I am sure that there are times when items in other genres also became available through similiar erros; perhaps, though, they were in less sensitive areas.

As a final aside, I have to question whether comparing Amazon to a regime that kills people, might be, just ever so slightly, overstepping the mark.

alley 20-Apr-09 8:11am
2 replies
To me this looks like the work not of a homophobic company but a specific homophobic employee. It seems obvious that the action was homophobic in nature, and stretches credulity for it to be unintentional by the employee. Kudos to Amazon for fixing the problem when it was brought to their attention; a big DUH to Amazon for needing to be told - a global change like that should have sent up warnings all over the place. The thing that bothers me about this is that there seems to be no attempt to discipline the employee for trying to enforce their homophobic beliefs which are supposedly against Amazon's policy... Perhaps the Arab reference is a bit over the top - but it shows an interesting trend away from the more usual comparison to Hitler :-)
abletts 21-Apr-09 2:48am
I am afraid that I remain unconvinced that it was a deliberate, and by that I mean malicious, act. If it had been children's or sport's books it would have hardly made a ripple. The fact that it happens to coincide with a subject that is perceived to be 'sensitive' in nature seems to guarantee that a McCarthyesque witchunt will ensue. If it can be proven that malevolent intent was there then by all means it should be punished. But punishment should not be expected by default. That in and of itself would be more akin to extremist behaviour.
willicueva 21-Jul-09 3:23am
Where have you read that the employee was not disciplined?
subpariq 20-Apr-09 2:22pm
What a bunch of crybabies. If a company doesn't sell the books you want, then don't buy books from them. Duh. Sometimes it seems like you folks get a charge from complaining. Get a life.
Luteguy 21-Apr-09 11:37am
1 reply
"What in God's name was Amazon doing trying to filter out adult content in the first place?" Um, for the same reason eBay and Google (etc.) do it. Minors use the site, as well as some people other than liberal "Cringely" who actually don't want to see that garbage in their search results.
Robert X. Cringely 28-Apr-09 1:56pm
I'm fine if amazon wants to put an adult filter on results (provided they can actually define what "adult" means to everyone's satisfaction -- good luck with that) which you can choose to apply if you want. google lets you specify three levels of 'safeness', though it's much easier to identify an explicit image than an explicit book. but google doesn't completely remove these things from its googlerank, which is essentially what amazon was doing. they were hiding the naughty bits and hoping no one would notice. and if not for the 'ham fisted' cataloging, it might have worked. - rxc

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Robert X. Cringely: Notes from the Trenches Newsletter

The one-stop resource center for IT professionals.

©1994-2010 Infoworld, Inc.