Much of the pushback on ALM has come from university customers -- in fact, it appears Adobe began dropping the ALM requirement in the higher education sector several weeks ago. "There is no way I could put one single point on what I find most objectionable to the program," wrote one university purchasing officer who had been actively engaged with Adobe on the topic. "There are the infrastructure requirements, the lack of support for concurrency, etc. But the one point where I most quickly blew my gaskets was the way in which the installations were going be counted and reported back to determine overages. Basically, every time a user installed a license key, it's going to go out and touch the Adobe servers as a registration. So if a faculty member installs on his desktop, on his laptop, and on his home computer -- which he is allowed to do -- that's going to look like three installations to Adobe. If they come and tell me 'guess what, you purchased 1,000 licenses but you've now got 3,000 registrations, so you owe us' that's all the info they'll have for me. I won't have any way of knowing who installed those extra 2,000 licenses and whether or not they were legal. Just thinking about some of the even more horrifying potential in this blows my top."
I think it's a good thing Adobe has been taken to school on this issue, and let's hope that other software publishers contemplating additional layers of copy protection for even their biggest customers will learn a lesson from it as well. If every software publisher insists on having their very own complex set of tools for tracking licenses, there will come a point when customers just say no.
And let's hope as well that customers learn the lesson that they do have that kind of power. But they'd better learn it fast, because Adobe wasn't the only major software publisher to introduce new DRM for its volume license customers last year. If you will recall, right after Adobe's ALM announcement, Microsoft started giving the details of its Software Protection Platform (SPP), which does everything corporate and academic users hated about ALM and then some.
Could SPP go the way of ALM? Microsoft will certainly be a tougher nut to crack, but once customers start flexing their muscles, there's no telling what could happen. What do you think -- is that a vista of DRM-free software I see on the horizon? Post your comments on my website, leave me a message in the Gripe Line voice mail at 1 888 875-7916, or write me at Foster@gripe2ed.com.
Read and post comments about this story here.
This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.
Download now »Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.
Download now »
The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.
Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation
Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect businesscritical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.
Download now »
Sign up to receive Business Resource Alerts
