Choosing the right technology for building the service layer in .NET

My two cents on when to choose Web API over WCF as the technology for the service layer

WCF vs Web API

WCF vs Web API

When designing the service layer in your applications the choice of the technology to be used in the service layer depends on many factors. In this article, I will present a discussion on when and how you can decide to select the right technology to implement the service layer when designing applications in .Net.

Two prominent contenders you have when designing the service layer in .Net are WCF and Web API. WCF is a development platform for SOA -- it provides many features and supports many different transport protocols. While WCF is a unified framework for building service oriented applications, Web API is a light weight alternative to build RESTful services that can be consumed by many different clients. RESTful services use basic HTTP and are simple with much less payload compared to SOAP services. You can use the WebHttpBinding in WCF to build non-SOAP RESTful services over HTTP. WCF is much more versatile in the sense that it can support many transport protocols -- HTTP, TCP, etc. You can leverage WCF to build secure, reliable, and transactional services that can support messaging, duplex communication and fast transport channels like, TCP, Named Pipes or UDP.

If you need to build lightweight, resource-oriented services over HTTP that can leverage the full features of the HTTP protocol, use versioning, cache control for browsers, and concurrency using Etags, Web API is a good choice. You should choose Web API over WCF in your service layer when you would want to expose your services to a broad range of clients i.e., Web browsers, mobiles, tablets, etc. Web API is light weight and is well suited on devices that have limited bandwidth like smart phones. One of the major constraints I faced while using WCF is its extensive configuration - Web API is much simpler and easy to use. I admit that WCF is much more versatile compared to Web API but, if you don't need the features that WCF provides and all you need is just RESTful services over HTTP, I would always prefer Web API as it is lightweight and simple to use.

I would also like to present a discussion on the differences between Web API and ASP.Net MVC as there are certain misconceptions on when to choose one over the other. The choice between ASP.Net MVC and Web API depends on many factors. There are certain considerations you would need to keep in mind before you decide to use any one of them.

Note that Web API uses HTTP verbs and hence HTTP verb based mapping for mapping methods to respective routes. You cannot have overloaded methods for the same HTTP verb for a particular route. You should be aware of this design constraint (though workarounds are available) when choosing between ASP.Net MVC and Web API. Unlike ASP.Net MVC, Web API uses routing based on HTTP verbs rather than URIs that contain actions. So, you can use Web API to write RESTful services that can leverage the HTTP protocol -- you can design services that are easier to test and maintain. Routing in Web API is much simpler and you can leverage content negotiation seamlessly. The routing model in ASP.Net MVC includes actions in the URIs.

Another point you would want to consider is whether you would like your functionality to be exposed for a specific application or whether the functionality should be generic. If you want to expose your services specific to one application only, you would want to use ASP.Net MVC -- the controller in an ASP.Net MVC application is application specific. On the contrary, you would want a Web API approach if your business needs require you to expose the functionality generically. I would prefer to use the Web API approach if the functionality is more data centric and the ASP.Net MVC approach if the functionality is more UI centric.

You should use Web API over ASP.Net MVC if you would want your controller to return data in multiple formats like, JSON, XML, etc. Also, specifying the data format in Web API is simple and easy to configure. Web API also scores over ASP.Net MVC in its ability to be self-hosted (similar to WCF). You would need ASP.Net MVC controllers to be hosted in the same webserver where the application has been hosted because the ASP.Net MVC controllers are part of the same application. On the contrary, you can host your Web API controllers outside of IIS also -- you can host it in a lightweight custom host and allow the service to be consumed by many different clients.

This article is published as part of the IDG Contributor Network. Want to Join?

To comment on this article and other InfoWorld content, visit InfoWorld's LinkedIn page, Facebook page and Twitter stream.
From CIO: 8 Free Online Courses to Grow Your Tech Skills
Notice to our Readers
We're now using social media to take your comments and feedback. Learn more about this here.