Linus' Response to Sarah's Message
Linus had his own response to Sarah's post that focuses on the libertarian angle I mentioned before. Like Sarah, he uses a profanity in his message. This seems to indicate that perhaps the two of them are more on the same page than they think? Heh, heh.
The thing is, the "victim card" is exactly about trying to enforce
your particular expectations on others, and trying to do so in a very
particular way. It's the old "think of the children" argument. And
it's bogus. Calling things "professional" is just more of the same -
trying to enforce some kind of convention on others by trying to claim
that it's the only acceptable way.
Because if you want me to "act professional", I can tell you that I'm
not interested. I'm sitting in my home office wearign a bathrobe. The
same way I'm not going to start wearing ties, I'm *also* not going to
buy into the fake politeness, the lying, the office politics and
backstabbing, the passive aggressiveness, and the buzzwords. Because
THAT is what "acting professionally" results in: people resort to all
kinds of really nasty things because they are forced to act out their
normal urges in unnatural ways.More at Mailing List Archives
Linus in Action on the LKML
Here's an example, in an unrelated LKML thread, of Linus dealing with another developer. I'll let you make your own judgement about it. Was he right in how he handled it, or should he have been more...er...diplomatic?
Mauro, SHUT THE F--K UP!
To make matters worse, commit f0ed2ce840b3 is clearly total and utter
CRAP even if it didn't break applications.More at Mailing List Archives
Final Thoughts: A Tempest in a Teapot?
It's quite possible that all of this is just a tempest in a teapot, and that most people could not care less about any of it. Still, it makes for a bit of juicy drama for Linux geeks who weren't aware of what's been happening on the LKML all these years.
In the end, I think I have to come down on the side of Linus (particularly given Sarah's use of a profanity in her own message). Despite some of the nastiness, I'd rather that a free exchange of ideas continue on the LKML, even if some of it takes place in ways that wouldn't happen in a corporate environment. Such blunt honesty and direct feedback has probably served Linux well over the years.
What's your take on this? Is Linus right? Is Sarah right? Or are they both wrong? Tell me in the comments.
This article is published as part of the IDG Contributor Network. Want to Join?