Shunra's network-testing crystal ball gets better

VE 4.0 adds much-needed automation, new features to WAN simulation engine

For IT, playing the “what if” game to predict how a new CRM application would behave over the corporate intranet used to require a stack of equipment and load of patience. With Version 4.0 of Shunra Virtual Enterprise (formerly Shunra Storm) much of the tedious trial and error is handled for the tester.

This version of Shunra’s hardware and software bundle wraps some much-needed testing automation around its excellent WAN simulation engine, providing an easier way to test application response across a wide range of WAN scenarios. Also new is a reporting module that does a great job of showing detailed information about each test run, and stellar integration with load testing tools.

Starting simply

I’ve had the luxury of running a Shunra appliance in my lab for a couple of years, and I can attest to how absolutely useful it is when reviewing network hardware or applications. Most recently, I used Shunra Storm 3.5 to test WAN optimization/acceleration appliances, and the emulation consistency is superb. I could create various WAN links with all of their link faults and simply load them up whenever I need them. One thing that was lacking in the old version was a way to automate testing over a range of test conditions, so I was happy to see this addressed in the 4.0 release.

Installing the 3U Shunra VE appliance is straightforward: Connect the management port to your local network, and your test clients and servers to the other available interfaces. My test unit came equipped with four 10/100Mbps copper Ethernet ports and two 1Gb Fiber SC ports. (You can also get the software on its own, as Shunra VE Desktop, which may be an alternative for small companies with simple WAN simulation needs.)

New to this release, Shunra’s software requires MySQL to keep track of test results. It’s included as part of the software installation, but I had trouble installing it on a Windows XP Pro PC that had a previous MySQL driver. I finally got it installed on a clean XP PC without any trouble.

Shunra’s magic starts with VE Modeler. VE Modeler uses Microsoft Visio as its drawing board for the test topology, and has custom Visio shapes to define end points, multi-network gateways, QoS gateways, and WAN clouds. All of these symbols have user-definable properties so that they accurately represent each part of the WAN to be tested. For instance, the WAN cloud defines latency, packet loss and other link faults, and the gateways define link speeds, queuing options, and bandwidth utilization. IT can link any number of symbols to create as simple or complex a WAN simulation as needed.

This release features a couple of new shapes that really spice up WAN simulation. The Packet Modifier shape dynamically changes the contents of the data packets as they pass through the Shunra VE. Settings in Packet Modifier, like MAC (media access control) address, IP address, and port, allow IT to test for data integrity as well as application performance.

The other new shape is the Twister. This Shunra link modifier creates alternate traffic paths while the test is running, adding a user-defined level of uncertainty to the simulation. Twister can change the route a packet takes based on a variety of criteria, such as probability, time, and packet count, so test simulations depicting backup WAN or load-balanced links can be executed in the Shunra VE. When the predefined criteria are met, Twister shifts traffic to the secondary link, dynamically changing the data path.

After the WAN is detailed in Visio, it is pushed out to the appliance and the emulation starts. While a simulation is running, testers may view real-time statistics of traffic as it passes through the WAN cloud shape. In previous releases, only limited information was available, but in 4.0, scrolling charts in VE Reporter display exactly what is happening in the WAN emulation.

Automatic for the people

Several new modules in 4.0 help automate the testing process. Benefiting from tight integration with Mercury LoadRunner and Segue SilkPerformer, the new VE Predictor manages the number of load generators, the number of virtual clients, and the WAN topology (previously described by VE Modeler).

Using a script created in LoadRunner, I devised a test plan in VE Predictor to control the LoadRunner injectors and define service level targets. I really liked that I was able to create and execute the test from within VE Predictor, taking advantage of LoadRunner’s scripting and load-generation engine, and then view the test results in an easy to read graphical layout.

Another new module, VE Profiler, takes this automation a step further by allowing testers to define a range of link speeds and WAN conditions, instead of a single WAN definition as in VE Predictor. What makes it unique is that testers can define a matrix of test criteria to evaluate. For all of the parameters (such as bandwidth utilization, latency, packet loss, and virtual users), testers can set the starting value, a maximum value (Shunra VE supports up to OC12), and define the step increments. VE Profiler also uses a LoadRunner or SilkPerformer load generator and test script during its execution.

At the end of the test definition wizard, VE Profiler calculates the number of iterations required to test all combinations of parameters and will estimate the time to completion. One thing I quickly found out is that I had to stay a little conservative on the ranges I wanted to test, and also the number of parameters, to get a test done in a timely manner. At first, I created a test that was going to run over 15,000 iterations and would have taken about two months of continuous running to complete. Use larger step values and restrain parameters to just what you are interested in for best results.

One of 4.0’s impressive new features is VE Reporter, a very comprehensive reporting and graphing utility that provides in-depth information for each test scenario. Previously, users had to take on faith that the Shunra appliance was working correctly. Not any more: With each test iteration, VE Reporter stores a wealth of data including number of packets in the cloud, minimum and maximum latency, bandwidth utilization on each gateway, and network quality.

All of this data is available in easy-to-view graphs and can be exported to Word, Excel, or HTML. VE Reporter offers excellent visibility into performance bottlenecks by displaying critical traffic information at each point of the simulation.

The Shunra VE 4.0 suite is an indispensable tool for large organizations that need to “field test” new applications but want to avoid costly field trials. The new modules are welcome additions, and the two new shapes really help round out the package. I am excited to see the integration with LoadRunner and SilkPerformer tied in with VE Predictor and VE Profiler, and the level of detail found in the reports is tremendous.

The one downside is Shunra VE 4.0’s cost: the $70,000 price puts this out of range for all but the largest enterprises. If you have the budget, though, the cost is worth it if IT can look into its Shunra crystal ball and know ahead of time just how an application will behave.

InfoWorld Scorecard
Performance (25.0%)
Manageability (30.0%)
Scalability (25.0%)
Setup (10.0%)
Value (10.0%)
Overall Score (100%)
Shunra Virtual Enterprise 4.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 8.5
Mobile Security Insider: iOS vs. Android vs. BlackBerry vs. Windows Phone
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies