Kings of open source monitoring

Built on open source, OpenNMS and Zenoss Enterprise take different paths to rich, scalable, and extensible network and systems monitoring

Network monitoring is a fact of life for IT departments. Monitoring software ranges from simple ICMP-based scripts for up/down monitoring to midrange products like SolarWinds to high-end offerings such as HP's OpenView and IBM's Tivoli -- all of which have their drawbacks. Simpler monitoring systems don't provide enough information about your network, while the feature-laden high-end systems can be prohibitively expensive. At the same time, midrange systems might not scale well for monitoring large networks.

Two network monitoring systems with open source roots, OpenNMS and Zenoss, provide a bevy of features at a lower (or no) cost than their high-end competitors, and can scale to monitor large numbers of network nodes. Both solutions compete with large commercial systems such as OpenView and Tivoli. They are advanced systems capable of monitoring a wide variety of network devices. OpenNMS is completely open source, while Zenoss offers Core, a free open source edition that can be extended with free Zenoss- and community-built add-ons.

[ The 2009 Bossie winners are in! See Best of Open Source Software Awards 2009 and even The greatest open source software of all time. ]

Although OpenNMS and Zenoss support a large number of common network devices, computers, and applications out of the box, some companies will have uncommon or specialized equipment that is not yet supported. Both provide facilities to extend the functionality of the system and to add custom network device support. Zenoss uses its ZenPack system, which is a Python-egg plug-in architecture.

OpenNMS has several ways to provide additional capabilities. First, most of the configuration information for OpenNMS exists in XML files in /etc/opennms. These files can be edited to add new notification methods and other small extensions to the application. Next are event automations, which allow you to specify an SQL query to look for thresholds being exceeded and create events or trigger actions (such as shell scripts). External tools -- such as mib2opennms for SNMP Traps and the mibParser for data collection -- can be used to convert SNMP MIB information into a format OpenNMS can use. Finally, if you're a Java programmer, it is pretty straightforward to create custom monitors and data collectors in Java.

In addition, both systems have the ability to run custom scripts, and they can use Nagios plug-ins to extend functionality. This is a handy feature, but note that it can hamper scalability for large networks. (See the sidebar, "Maximize the performance of your monitoring system.")

Big, complex
OpenNMS and Zenoss put in good efforts at making their applications easy to use, providing Web interfaces for management and information delivery. Nevertheless, to get the full network monitoring benefits of these two systems, you will need to roll up your sleeves and spend at least some time on the command line. For example, neither has the ability to import a list of devices via the Web interface. And we have to face the fact that an enterprise-grade network monitoring system is not a simple piece of software. Despite both companies' best efforts at making their software easy to manage, these are complex systems, and IT staff will want to read all the documentation and take full advantage of the training classes offered by both companies.

I was pleasantly surprised to find that installation is quite easy for the two products, and both support a variety of Unix-ish platforms, including various Linux distributions, FreeBSD, Solaris, and Mac OS X. OpenNMS can also run on OpenBSD and Windows. As a longtime Debian user, I'm used to being disappointed when big commercial applications do not support Debian's native apt installer or even deb packages. So I was pleased that Zenoss provides stand-alone deb packages with dependencies, and OpenNMS maintains a software repository for use with Debian's apt software installation system.

Further, both of these network monitoring systems can be run on virtualization platforms such as VMware and Xen. Zenoss maintains a VMware image of its open source Core version, and OpenNMS makes a VMware image available for download from SourceForge. My company runs OpenNMS on an Amazon EC2 cloud computing instance.

InfoWorld Scorecard
Ease of use (20.0%)
Setup (10.0%)
Value (20.0%)
Customization (10.0%)
Documentation (20.0%)
Features (20.0%)
Overall Score (100%)
OpenNMS 1.6.5 6.0 8.0 10.0 9.0 6.0 7.0 7.5
Zenoss Enterprise 2.4 7.0 8.0 7.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 7.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 Page
Recommended
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies