InfoWorld's 2011 Technology of the Year Awards recognize the best products at the forefront of today's top data center, desktop, mobile, and programming trends
This year's award-winning CPUs -- the 12-core AMD Opteron Magny-Cours and the 8-core Intel Xeon Nehalem-EX -- both provide superior performance when many tasks are running in parallel. AMD's Magny-Cours offers the best price/performance for highly concurrent workloads, while Intel's Nehalem-EX targets high-capacity SMP servers with RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) features previously found only in mainframes, RISC/Unix servers, and Itanium.
We fully expect the march toward more cores to continue. Many-core processors, combined with denser RAM configurations, all hooked up to high-capacity NICs (multiple 10Gb Ethernet adapters) are the basis of future in-house, "private" clouds.
[ Read about the winning hardware, software, and development tools in our slideshow, "InfoWorld's 2011 Technology of the Year Award winners." ]
Whether such platforms will ever replace traditional desktops -- via virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) -- is still unclear. Even ignoring issues of user acceptance, deploying VDI on a large scale can be both costly and complex. Starter solutions such as Kaviza VDI-in-a-box -- another of our award winners -- put desktop virtualization within anyone's reach.
Where Microsoft lives
Between the iPad and the cloud lies the traditional Windows desktop and its supporting infrastructure of multiuser hosts, such as CMS and collaboration platforms, that enable users to share files, participate in workflows, and have immediate access to business data. Here, Microsoft's stellar SharePoint 2010 and Exchange 2010 offer the richest set of services by which users can get the benefits of collaboration and communication with the least amount of difficulty.
Microsoft's wins in these server software categories (plus two more awards for Visual Studio 2010 and Silverlight 4) demonstrate that the company is far from the legacy, Windows-and-Office-only vendor it is often portrayed as. Microsoft did not luck into its recent successes, but had the insight to identify needs and provide intelligent solutions. Equally remarkable is the company's success with younger consumers via the Xbox 360 and the stunning Kinect add-on. There is no other company that is both a market leader in consumer hardware and a provider of prize-winning enterprise software -- not Apple, nor HP, nor Google. Odd then, that Microsoft can't seem to find its footing in mobile or the cloud.
Among vendors, Microsoft led the field with four awards this year. Surprisingly under-represented is HP, although the company bested Dell and IBM in our server blades shoot-out -- and thereby nabbed our award for best blades system. By comparison, Dell continued to surprise us all year long, winning a number of product roundups and coming close in others. It receives two of our Technology of the Year awards and could easily have won a few more. Dell has been innovating at a fast pace and continues to lead all comers in price/performance in just about every category.
This story, "The best hardware and software of the year," was originally published at InfoWorld.com. Follow the latest developments in applications, cloud computing, software development, hardware, mobile computing, security, storage, virtualization, and Windows at InfoWorld.com.
This weekend's Windows 10 upgrade has users angry, and it's unclear if the ploy will continue
Here’s the best of the best for Windows 10. Sometimes good things come in free packages
Speaking at the O'Reilly Fluent conference, Eich also endorsed the Service Workers mobile app...
After Microsoft rolled out its Linux subsystem for Windows 10, users worked out a number of surprising...
Hackers are maliciously manipulating both sides of the web experience, but a little due diligence goes...
OpenStack is set to become a Docker-ized app that runs on Kubernetes and help Google's plans for an...
Would you commit to a platform for internet applications? Then why would you do so for IoT...