A tale of two SAN failures

Enterprise-class storage systems are incredibly fault tolerant, but even the most reliable systems can fail in the hands of users

Become An Insider

Sign up now and get FREE access to hundreds of Insider articles, guides, reviews, interviews, blogs, and other premium content. Learn more.

By definition, enterprise-class primary storage is rock solid. It'd better be -- without bulletproof storage, the rest of the application infrastructure built on top of it can't hope to be reliable. Applications have enough problems of their own without flaky storage making matters worse. That's why enterprises spend huge portions of their IT budgets to buy the best, most reliable storage infrastructure they can afford.

Redundant disks, redundant controllers, mirrored cache, and redundant storage networking fabrics go a long way toward delivering the kind of fault-tolerant storage infrastructures we've come to expect in mission-critical environments. But even the most highly redundant storage architecture out there can't protect itself from one threat: you.

Lest you be offended, "you" includes me, too. Among the huge number of enterprise storage devices I've laid hands on over the years, only one ever crashed catastrophically due to hardware failure. On the other hand, I've lost count of the number of outages I've seen caused by bad documentation, bad tech support advice, insufficient training, and software or firmware that somehow overlooked the fact it might be used by actual human beings one day.

As if to underscore this phenomenon, I've witnessed two primary storage environments crumble to the ground within the past month. Cue the ominous music.

To continue reading this article register now