In most cases, a public cloud service will charge more to host your infrastructure long term than it would cost you to purchase and maintain that infrastructure yourself. By the same token, though, you don't want to buy and babysit infrastructure you need only part of the time.
That's one of the main ideas behind the hybrid cloud: Build and operate a private cloud in your own data center and burst to a service that charges by the hour when you need it.
[ Read the interview with VMware's CEO: "What we plan for the post-PC era." | And get the no-nonsense explanations and advice you need to take real advantage of cloud computing in InfoWorld editors' 21-page Cloud Computing Deep Dive PDF special report. ]
But you should be able to do that seamlessly -- and you have to trust the provider. That's why I was struck by what VMware CEO Paul Maritz said in a recent interview with IDG Enterprise Chief Content Office John Gallant and me, when he talked about the 1,000 or so public cloud service providers that are running the VMware stack:
Within that community, what we've elected to do is to try and pick a very small subset of [providers] who are committed to have the same suite in their public clouds. So in particular that user interface is going to be common between the two. The way that you describe and secure and manage your workloads will look the same internally versus externally.
In other words, VMware has cultivated an elite group of providers that is offering VMware-based infrastructure as a service to customers. VMware has close to 80 percent market share for a reason (see the InfoWorld Test Center's recent virtualization shoot-out for details). So in the hybrid cloud model, it should be reasonably seamless for a customer that has standardized on VMware to burst to a public cloud provider that offers VMware infrastructure as a service and manage it all as a whole. When I asked Maritz whether this was the general idea, he responded: "That's exactly what we're trying to do."
But that doesn't address the trust factor. In case you haven't noticed, enterprises haven't exactly rushed to embrace the public cloud, an aversion the Amazon outage and recent horrific security breaches have only served to underline. So who are these providers? Here's where Maritz really gets interesting:
We've created this partnership that we call the vCloud Data Center Partnership, and try to recruit...credible enterprise service provider partners. So today we have Verizon... SingTel in Asia, Colt in Europe. Colt is the City of London telephone company that carries all the fiber optic cable for the financial industry in Europe. And Softbank in Japan, which is the second largest telecom operator in Japan. Those are the four anchor tenants.
According to Maritz, a smaller provider named Bluelock is also in the mix, and "we'll expand that by probably another three or four over the next several months."
I have no idea whether VMware will be successful in spawning a global consortium of public VMware clouds operated by, primarily, major telecom providers. But I do know that customers tend to use Amazon for dev and test and disaster recovery rather than for core workloads. Over the next few years, as the hybrid cloud climbs the adoption curve, we'll need public IaaS providers that are enterprise class -- and let you manage public and private infrastructure as one.
This article, "Is there a new, monster VMware cloud coming?," originally appeared at InfoWorld.com. Read more of Eric Knorr's Modernizing IT blog, and for the latest business technology news, follow InfoWorld on Twitter.