Putting predictive analytics to work

Predictive analytics involves both art and science, but getting started isn't for high rollers only. Here's how to ensure a successful outcome

The Orlando Magic's analytics team spent two years honing its skills on the business side.

"Eighteen to 20 months ago, we knew virtually nothing about predictive analytics," says Anthony Perez, director of business strategy for the NBA franchise. While his team was in fact working on predictive analytics well before that, Perez added, their tools weren't powerful enough to give them insights they needed, and the group needed to scale up its efforts. So Perez bought in new, more powerful software from SAS and began climbing the learning curve.

[ Explore the current trends and solutions in BI with InfoWorld's interactive Business Intelligence iGuide. | Discover what's new in business applications with InfoWorld's Technology: Applications newsletter. ]

Today the established practice is not only helping optimize ticket sales but is also providing tools to help the coaching staff predict the best lineups for each basketball game, and which potential players offer the best value for the money.

Perez's team began by using analytic models to predict which games would oversell and which would undersell. The box office then took that information and adjusted prices to maximize attendance -- and profits. "This season we had the largest ticket revenue in the history of our franchise, and we played only 34 games of the 45-game season due to the lockout," he says.

Now those models are run and prices fine-tuned every day. Ask him about how the models are used to predict the best team match-ups and the game strategy, however, and Perez is less forthcoming. "That's the black box nobody talks about," he says.

Although it's still fairly early going, other organizations are tackling the learning curve with predictive analytics, the forward-looking data mining discipline that combines algorithmic models with historical data to answer questions such as how likely a given customer will be to renew a season ticket. The models assign probabilities to each person. Armed with that data, the business can prepare to take action. Additional analysis can then be applied to predict how successful different courses of action will be.

The use of predictive analytics is common in industries such telecommunications, financial services and retail, says Gareth Herschel, an analyst at Gartner Inc. "But overall it's still a relatively small percentage of organizations that use it -- maybe 5 percent."

Nonetheless, interest is high in organizations that are still focused on historical, "descriptive analytics," and in businesses with established predictive analytics practices that are now moving outside of traditional niches such as marketing and risk management. They're predicting website click-through rates and overall behavior, and helping HR anticipate which employees are likely to churn. Another area is help desk call routing, where models can be used to determine which agent is likely to do the best job of answering a given customer question.

Related blog: Robert L. Mitchell: Who owns your analytics group?

"There's more interest because there's more data," says Dean Abbott, president of consultancy Abbott Analytics. "The buzz is about momentum. People are saying this is something I need to do."

But you have to walk before you can run, and with its data-heavy demands, predictive analytics isn't something to take up lightly, or haphazardly. We asked businesses that are new to the game as well as seasoned professionals to share their experiences. Start small, they say, partner closely with the business to define the problem, continuously test and refine the model, put results in terms business decision makers can understand and, above all, make sure the business is willing and able to act based on those predictions.

Making the business case

Consumer products company Procter & Gamble Co. makes extensive use of analytics to project future trends, but it wasn't always that way, says Guy Peri, director of business intelligence for P&G's Global Business Services organization. "This used to be a rear-view mirror-looking company, but what happened six months ago isn't actionable. Now we're using advanced analytics to be more forward looking and to manage by exception," he says, which means separating out the anomalies to identify and project genuine trends.

P&G uses predictive analytics for everything from projecting the growth of markets and market shares to predicting when manufacturing equipment will fail, and it uses visualization to help executives see which events are normal business variations and which require intervention. "We focus the business on what really matters," Peri says.

The place to start is with a clear understanding of the business proposition, and that's a collaborative process. "Be clear on what the question is, and what action should be taken" when the results come back, he says.

It's also important to keep the scope focused. Mission creep can destroy your credibility in a hurry, Peri says. Early on, P&G developed a model to project future market shares for regional business leaders in a line of business he declined to identify. It was successful until the company tried to use the same model to accommodate the needs of other business leaders.

Those requests required a more granular level of detail, but his group tried to make do with the same model. "The model became unreliable, and that undermined the credibility of the original analysis," which had been spot-on, he says.

New users need to take several steps to get started: Hire a trained analyst who knows how to develop a model and apply it to a business problem, find the right data to feed the models, win the support of both the business decision maker and an executive sponsor in the business who are committed to championing the effort -- and take action on the results.

"Notice I didn't mention tools," Peri says. "Resist the temptation to buy a million-dollar piece of software that will solve all of your problems. There isn't one," he says, and you don't need to make that investment for your first couple of projects. Instead, invest in training staff on advanced spreadsheet modeling.

"All of this can be done with Excel to get started." Only when you are ready to scale up do you need to investigate bigger, platform-level types of tools, he says.

Keeping users closeBryan Jones started on a shoestring budget -- but that's not why his first effort at predictive analytics was a failure. Jones, director of countermeasures and performance evaluations at the Office of Inspector General within the U.S. Post Office, wanted to use predictive analytics to help investigators determine which health care claims were most likely to be fraudulent.

After eight months he had a working model, but the independent analytics group working on the project wasn't fully engaged with the department that would be using the tool. As a result, the raw spreadsheet output mailed to each office was largely ignored by investigators.

Fortunately, Jones' group had the unwavering support of the Inspector General. "You're dead in the water if you don't have that support from the top," he says.

The second time around Jones hired a consultant to help with modeling and data prep, and embedded an analyst within the group that would be using the results.

And they made those results more 'real' to users. For a team investigating contract fraud, for instance, his team placed the results in a Web-based interactive heat map that showed each contract as a circle, with larger circles representing the biggest costs and red circles the highest risk for fraud.

Investigators could then click on the circles to drill down on the details of each contract, as well as related contracts, that are at risk. "That's when people started to notice that we really had something that could help them," he says.

Now departments come to him with requests, and they assign someone from their own group to work with Jones' team. Once the output is ready, the person returns to their group and teaches others how to use it. Jones doesn't have hard return on numbers yet but will be reporting on increased arrests, dollars recovered and other metrics.

There were also unanticipated benefits. "Now people understand that we can be proactive. That was a return we didn't have on our list," he says, and new investigators that don't have 25 years of experience and connections can get up to speed quickly. "These tools can level the playing field," Jones says.

Jones's advice: Get close to your customer, get professional help building your first model and present the results in a compelling, easy to understand way. "We didn't have the right people or expertise to begin with. We didn't know what we didn't know," he says, so Jones turned to an outside data-mining expert to help with the models. "That relationship helped us understand why we failed and kept us from making the same mistakes again."

Overcoming business skepticism

While hiring a consultant can help with some of the technical details, that's only part of the challenge, says John Elder, principal with Elder Research, a consultancy that worked with Jones' team. "Over 16 years we have solved over 90 percent of the technical problems we've been asked to help with, but only 65 percent of the solutions have gone on to be implemented."

The problem, generally, is that the people the model is intended to help don't use it. "We technical people have to do a better job making the business case for the model and showing the payoff," Elder says.

Convincing decision makers to use the results can be as difficult as getting them to go along with the project in the first place, because the predictions may be the exact opposite of what their business intuition tells them, says Anne Robinson, president-elect for the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (Informs) the professional society for business analytics. "As you get more involved with analytics it becomes counter-intuitive. But it's those deviations from what you're doing that bring the rewards, because when the results are intuitive you find that most people are already doing them."

Several years ago Cisco Systems created "propensity to buy" models -- to figure the probability that customers will buy this quarter or next, or never. The models cover every product in every sales territory. The salespeople felt they already knew what some of the people identified by the model were going to buy, so Cisco excluded those sales when calculating the return on its effort. "The first year we did it, we generated $1 billion in sales uplift," says Theresa Kushner, Cisco's senior director of customer and influencer intelligence. "We had an experience to line up against what they thought they believed."

Peri learned the hard way that 80 percent of a predictive analytics project is cultural. "I came in naively thinking that if I had a model that does all of these great things it will just work. But you have to be aware of how people make decisions and how it will transform that process."

P&G once developed a model designed to provide an "early warning" on how each business was going to perform. "It was actually quite accurate, but the warnings were given in such as way that people didn't understand how to take action on them, and so we didn't get the proactive decisions we wanted," he says. Lesson learned: "Analytics is only valuable when you take action on the insight."

People can also feel threatened by analytics. "There's a concern initially that the model is designed to take over decision-making or doesn't respect my business knowledge," Peri says. Users need to understand that the predictive model serves as a decision support tool and how to use the output in their own decision-making processes.

Don't waste time trying to get people to believe in the model, says Cisco's Kushner. Instead, do a test and present the results. In this way you're not countering their knowledge: The science is. "This is math; this is fact; this is statistics. You have an experiment to line up against what they thought they believed."

Ultimately, however, predictive analytics is forcing a showdown between data-driven and intuition-based decision making, says Eric Siegel, president of the analytics training firm and conference organizer Prediction Impact Inc. "That's the big ideological battle. It's a religious debate."

Data: Getting to good enough

On the technology side, both building the model and preparing the data can be stumbling points. Predictive analytics is an art as well as a science, and it takes time and effort to build that first model and get the data right, says Abbott. "But once you build the first one, the next one is much less expensive to model" -- assuming you're using the same data. Analysts building a new, entirely different model that uses different data might find that project just as time consuming as the first. Nonetheless, he says, "The more experience one gains, the faster the process becomes."

Data preparation issues can quickly derail a project, says Siegel. "The software vendors skip that point because all of the data in the demo has already been put into the correct format. They don't get into it because it's the biggest obstacle on the technical side of project execution -- and it can't be automated. It's a programming job."

1 2 Page
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies