What makes an IT organization next-gen rather than last-gen? Great question. Here's the essence:
Last-generation IT was separate from the business, aligned with the business, and responsible for providing technology to the business. Next-generation IT is integrated into the business, collaborates at all levels, and is responsible for making sure business change happens as intended.
[ Find out the 10 business skills every IT pro must master, beware the 9 warning signs of bad IT architecture, and steer clear of the 12 "best practices" IT should avoid at all costs. | For more of Bob Lewis' continuing IT management wisdom, check out his Advice Line newsletter. ]
Yes, that's right: While next-generation IT has just as much responsibility for making information technology happen as last-generation IT did, what makes next-generation IT different has nothing to do with technology.
First and foremost, it has everything to do with mastering the fine art of business change management.
The essence of business change management
Think of an organization as a collection of balls interconnected by coiled springs. Think of a business change as an attempt to move only one of the balls into a new position.
What's going to happen? As soon as you let go, the ball will return to the exact same position it was in before you moved it.
Organizations have a lot of interconnected parts, all of which have co-evolved into a stable configuration. Change just one and it no longer fits, which means that either all the others change too, or the one you're trying to change stays the same in spite of your best efforts.
Which is lesson No. 1 in business change management: An organization will resist change even if nobody in the organization resists change. Business change management takes more than just finding the change resisters and shooting them. It takes figuring out what else has to change in the organization so that it can adjust into a new configuration.
Everything you know about change resistance is wrong
Of course, every organization includes employees who are resistant to change. To deal with them you first have to unlearn most of the bunk that's bandied about.
Start with the "who moved my cheese" theory of business change management, which states, more or less, that employees naturally resist change. It's one of those theories that remains popular because it provides an easy target to blame when change fails to materialize, even though the most cursory look at the evidence shows it's wrong. The proof? It's as close as your mobile phone.
If employees naturally resisted change, none of them would own a personal smartphone; certainly none of them would pressure for BYOD. Think smartphones are an anomaly? Of course you don't, because you probably own a tablet as well, a device that didn't exist five years ago. You probably download most of the music you listen to rather than buying CDs, and even if you still buy CDs, that means you don't buy LPs, which you can't, because most of those people who supposedly resist change abandoned LPs for CDs back in the last century.