Joomla developers quickly built on the legacy of Mambo, especially improving administration. What the basic system lacks in
functionality can usually be fixed by installing a component. Version 1.5 (which was in Release Candidate 1 stage during testing) appears to address concerns
about the complexity of the menu system while injecting more Web 2.0 functions (such as more design latitude in how pages
appear).
Plone 3.0
Plone does one thing -- Web content management -- and does it with aplomb. That's why you'll find well-known U.S. and international
organizations in most industries running their Web sites, internets, and extranets with Plone.
This CMS has outstanding multilingual content management (with localized workflow), a powerful page editor, and flexible navigation.
Version 3.0 introduces an inline editor, link checking, a portlets engine (for including content from other Web sites), and
versioning, supports the search engine Sitemap protocol and wiki markup, and has full-text indexing of Word and PDF documents.
Setting up and customizing Plone isn't taxing. By following the well-done documentation and tutorials, I updated the visual
design of my test Plone site in a few hours, all accomplished using the Web Developer Extension for Firefox along with an
excellent Plone download, DIYPloneStyle. It's also relatively easy to add more advanced functionality (such as having navigation
sections that are automatically generated from the contents of a folder) with a few style sheet changes.
On the administration side, Plone provides a range of enterprise-friendly functions, from authentication using OpenID, Active
Directory, or LDAP to granular permissions for groups, roles, and workflows. All this is controlled from the Zope Management
Interface, though I wish it was integrated into the rest of the system. That said, individuals can easily control who can
view, edit, and approve their content -- without going through an administrator.
With design done, my testing moved to managing content. Again, Plone doesn't demand any extraordinary skills. For example,
the folder view and AJAX-based drag-and-drop let me quickly reorder content, which was then reflected in the site's navigation.
Site maps are automatically generated and updated. What's more, any collection (a grouping of content that developers create
without writing code) or search result can be turned into an RSS feed.
The desktop-style page editor (based on the Kupu editor) is notable for converting Microsoft's text markup into clean XHTML
and also for a great asset browser that previews images and links. Plone 3.0's inline editing was a big help for quick updates
because you don't have to open a separate interface: Just click on the text area requiring revisions.
 |
| The Bottom Line |
Alfresco Community Edition 2.1 Alfresco Software, alfresco.com
|
Excellent 9.2 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Ease-of-use |
9 |
25% |
 |
| Features |
10 |
25% |
 |
| Security |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Scalability |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Management |
8 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
9 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Free under GPL 2 with FLOSS exception
Platforms: Windows and Linux
Bottom Line: This very inclusive offering, developed using Java, sits on top of a JSR-170 content repository. Out of the box Alfresco provides
a Web portal framework; CIFS (file share) interface that works on Windows and Linux clients; and a Web-content management
system –- plus document, imagine, and records management. Further, Alfresco scales well with options for deploying content
to multiple servers.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|
 |
| The Bottom Line |
DotNetNuke 4.4.5 DotNetNuke, dotnetnuke.com
|
Very Good 8.4 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Ease-of-use |
9 |
25% |
 |
| Features |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Security |
8 |
15% |
 |
| Scalability |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Management |
8 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
8 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Free under BSD-style license
Platforms: ASP.Net, Windows Server, SQL Server 2005
Bottom Line: Written in VB.Net, DotNetNuke is an extensible content management system suitable for intranets, extranets, and public Web
sites. The core distribution includes three dozen CMS modules, including a skin system (based on simple templates) that separates
design from content, personalization, and search; other modules range from e-commerce systems and photo galleries to blogs,
forums, and wikis. Commercial publishers offer other components.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|
 |
| The Bottom Line |
Drupal 5.2 Drupal, http://www/drupal.org
|
Very Good 8.3 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Ease-of-use |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Features |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Security |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Scalability |
8 |
15% |
 |
| Management |
8 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
9 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Free under GPL
Platforms: Apache or IIS Web servers; Unix, Linux, BSD, Solaris, Windows, or Mac OS X; PHP; PHP-supported database server (MySQL or PostgreSQL)
Bottom Line: Written in PHP, Drupal's Web application framework anchors a content management system that includes modules for e-commerce
and workflow. Drupal, unlike other systems, also has a taxonomy system to classify content – but this does take extra work
to configure (as does setup). Themes are created with the standard PHPTemplate engine. A blogging system makes this system
good for building online communities.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|
 |
| The Bottom Line |
Plone 3.0 Plone Foundation, plone.org
|
Very Good 8.6 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Ease-of-use |
9 |
25% |
 |
| Features |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Scalability |
8 |
15% |
 |
| Security |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Management |
9 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
9 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Free under GPL
Platforms: Windows, Mac OS X, BSD, Solaris, and SuSE
Bottom Line: The Plone CMS, which is built on top of the Zope application server, performs well for intranets – as well as a document management
server and team collaboration tool. The system is easy to use and also notable for its multi-lingual capabilities. Additionally,
Plone powers a number of high-traffic Internet sites, though this configuration should included additional components, such
as Squid caching.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|